2020 Electronic and Computer Patent Law Summit - Weekly Webinar Series
June 4 to 25, 2020
Improve Your Patent Practice
In light of the global health crisis and to prioritize the well being and safety of the IP community we have transformed the Electronic and Computer Patent Law Summit experience.
For the first time in this event's history, we are switching to an immersive virtual experience. The 2020 Electronic and Computer Patent Law Summit Series will be presented in four easy-to-schedule-around sessions that you can join from your computer or mobile device.
Join us from 2 - 3 pm Eastern every Thursday in June as we explore topics relevant to electronic and computer patent law, and earn plenty of CLE credit along the way.

The program for this month-long weekly webinar event will cover a broad range of topics including:
- June 4 - Launching an OS IP Compliance Program from Scratch (non-CLE)
- June 11 - Patenting AI and the Lifecycle of an AI Patent
- June 18 - Legislative and Case Law Updates and Section 101 Best Practices for Patent Prosecution
- June 25 - US v. EU Post Grant Comparison AND Litigating and Licensing in Other Jurisdictions
Guidance on these topics and more will be presented by leading in-house and private practitioners, as well as preeminent legal scholars. 60 minutes of CLE credit will be applied for where applicable. Thank you to the AIPLA Electronic & Computer Law Committee for working to put this Series together.

Who Should Attend
In-house counsel, intellectual property practitioners including litigators and patent prosecution attorneys, transactional attorneys, and scholars who are generally interested in developments surrounding intellectual property law as it relates to electronic technology and digital computing. The Summit provides an excellent forum to share knowledge and best practices.
What You Will Learn
- Pragmatic advice as to how to evolve your practice in view of changing contours of Intellectual property law
- Guidance from prosecutors and transactional experts as to the evolution of patent drafting strategies for emerging technologies
- How the changing litigation landscape may affect you’re your practice and your clients’ intellectual property strategies
Registration Options
- Purchase all programs in the Summit series at a discounted package rate ($195 Member/$395 Non-member Rate for all sessions). CLICK HERE for the FULL PACKAGE REGISTRATION
- Register to attend an individual session ($99 Member/$249 Non-member rate per session). Register for individual programs using the links below (the June 4 program will be automatically added to any individual program purchase, after the course is added to your catalog).
This online event series is not included in All Access Pass subscriptions.
Sponsors




Speakers
-
Graham, Emma
Mewburn Ellis | Partner
Emma works across all stages of the IP lifecycle from drafting and prosecuting patents to managing offensive and defensive opposition proceedings at the EPO. -
Henry, Coulter "Coby"
Reem Manufacturing | Senior IP Counsel
-
Jhanb, Pratik
Aristocrat Technologies
-
Khan, Sikander M.
Haynes Beffel & Wolfeld LLP
Sikander Khan specializes in building AI patent portfolios. -
Lewis I.D., Jeffrey
Foley Hoag | Partner
Jeffrey I. D. Lewis is a partner at Foley Hoag, resident in the firm’s New York office, and an AIPLA Past President. A chemical engineer and registered patent attorney, Jeff concentrates on patent and trademark litigation, counseling and licensing, as well as other intellectual property and general litigation. He regularly represents plaintiffs as well as defendants – both at trial and on appeal – in a range of technology-related sectors with a focus on pharmaceuticals, chemicals, mechanical/medical-device, biotechnology and life sciences. He also has represented pharmaceutical innovators in numerous Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) patent litigations. Jeff has appeared in several dozen cases before the U.S. federal district courts, and has argued numerous appeals before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. -
Mazour, Eli
Harrity & Harrity, LLP | Partner
Eli Mazour’s practice focuses on helping large technology companies build valuable, high-quality patent portfolios in an efficient manner. -
Perilla, Jason M.
Thomas|Horstemeyer, LLP | Partner
In his practice as a Registered Patent Attorney, Jason’s experience includes the preparation and prosecution of patent applications in various fields, including transmitters and receivers, video processors, software, semiconductor design and manufacturing, medical instruments, power systems, software, and business methods, among others. -
Savee, Margaux
Polsinelli PC | Principal
Margaux Savee is a principal and patent attorney at Polsinelli, representing Fortune 100 companies in complex patent disputes. -
Weinstock, Nicholas
Qualcomm | Patent Counsel
News
-
AIPLA Comments on CNIPA Draft Measures for Prioritized Patent Examination
April 1, 2026
Arlington, VA. March 30, 2026 – The American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) submitted comments to the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) regarding the Draft Measures for the Administration of Prioritized Examination of Patents. -
AIPLA Files Amicus Brief in Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. v. Amarin Pharma, Inc
March 31, 2026
Arlington, VA. March 27, 2026 – The American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) filed an amicus curiae brief with the Supreme Court in Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. v. Amarin Pharma, Inc., No. 24-889. AIPLA urges the Court to affirm the Federal Circuit’s application of the established Iqbal/Twombly pleading standard and inducement law in reviewing Hikma’s motion to dismiss Amarin’s claim that Hikma’s conduct, in combination with its “skinny label,” induced infringement of Amarin’s patented treatment methods. -
Supreme Court Issues Unanimous Decision in Cox Communications, Inc. v. Sony Music Entertainment
March 25, 2026
On March 25, 2026, the Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in Cox Communications, Inc. v. Sony Music Entertainment. The majority opinion limits contributory liability to situations where a party intended that its service be used for infringement, either by affirmatively inducing infringement or by selling a service tailored to infringement. A concurring opinion by Justice Sotomayor argues that the material contribution test should be retained, and that other forms of secondary liability can be found, which is consistent with the position asserted by AIPLA in its amicus brief filed on September 5, 2025. To read the opinion of the Court, please click here. -
AIPLA Comments on the Draft Trademark Law of the People’s Republic of China
March 23, 2026
Arlington, VA. February 9, 2026 – The American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) submitted comments to the Legislative Affairs Commission of the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress regarding the latest Draft Trademark Law of the People’s Republic of China. AIPLA recognized the NPC’s efforts to streamline trademark procedures, strengthen protection, and address abusive and bad-faith filing practices. -
AIPLA Files Amicus Brief in USAA v. PNC Bank
March 3, 2026
Arlington, VA. March 2, 2026 – The American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) filed an amicus brief with the Supreme Court in USAA v. PNC Bank, N.A., No. 25-853, in support of USAA’s petition for certiorari, urging the Court to provide much-needed guidance to address the unpredictable and overly broad application of the judicial exceptions to patent-eligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101, particularly the “abstract idea” exception.
