AIPLA CLE Webinar: Discovery in AI Patent Litigation

November 4, 2026 1:00 PM to 2:30 PM

Credits

Up to 90 Minutes CLE Eligible

Registration

Fee: View Pricing Below

Register Now

AI systems do not fit the discovery playbook patent litigators have relied on for two decades. The accused functionality lives in model weights, training data, and inference pipelines rather than in human-readable code, and traditional ESI protocols and source code protective orders were never written to reach them. Yet the source code protocol developed for patent litigation -- the air-gapped machine, the secure room, the printing caps -- has become the default across AI litigation, carried into copyright, employment, and health care disputes largely on stipulation and now cited back to courts as standard practice. This 90-minute program brings together a forensic examiner and source code expert and two senior attorneys and AI experts to explain what conventional discovery orders cover and what they leave out.  Topics include preservation and volume challenges unique to AI, negotiating access to models and training data manifests, inspection protocols that make technical analysis possible, mapping claim elements to model artifacts, construing AI and ML claim terms, and third-party discovery from model developers. Attendees will leave with practical guidance for drafting protective orders and discovery requests that reach what actually matters in an AI patent case.

Presented by:
Jennifer Maisal, Rothwell Figg
Jim Ko, Ko IP & AI Law
Joe Sremack, Resolution Economics

 

This event is free to AIPLA members who are not requesting CLE. Standard webinar pricing applies to those requesting CLE. CLE is included for our All-Access Pass holders and eligible Corporate Subscribers.

Pricing below only applies to those requesting CLE

Registration TypeAIPLA Member Rate Non-Member Rate
Individual Registration$99$249
2-5 Attendees per Site$249$399
6-10 Attendees per Site$449$599
11-15 Attendees per Site  $649$799
16-20 Attendees per Site  $749$899
21+ Attendees per Site$849$999

Special rate for AIPLA Solo Practitioner Members:  $65

Special rate for AIPLA Student Members:  $10 Please contact cle@aipla.org for Student Member registration.


In response to Covid-19, AIPLA has put in-place a new process for Multiple Attendee Site registrations that allows each site registrant to participate in the webinar independently. Contact cle@aipla.org at least 3 business days prior to the live webinar for site registrations. Space is limited; seats cannot be guaranteed even with the purchase of a site registration.


Paid Registration Includes:

  • CLE certification/processing for applicable states.  Reference CLE Information below for complete details.  
  • Webinar materials, including complete CLE processing information.


Cancellation Policy:

To get full refund, registrant must request refund five (5) days prior to live event. If less than five (5) days, registrant is transferred to product. 

System requirements: 

Webinar access is compatible with any Windows 7 or later computer, Android OS devices, or Apple/iOS devices.  

Accessibility for hearing impaired:

AIPLA’s webinars are available and accessible to individuals who are hearing impaired. If anyone at your location would like to know more about accommodations, please contact cle@aipla.org. We ask that you let us know at least 7 business days prior to the webinar, to ensure that we can identify and deploy the solution that best fits the registrants needs.

CLE INFORMATION 

CLE is approved with the following states:

  • Alaska
  • California
  • Missouri
  • New Jersey (Under New Jersey's Reciprocity Rule)
  • New York (Under New York's Approved Jurisdiction Policy)
  • Pennsylvania
  • Texas
  • Vermont

AIPLA will automatically apply for CLE accreditation in the following states: 

  • Illinois
  • Minnesota
  • Ohio
  • Tennessee
  • Virginia
  • Washington

For information on CLE accreditation in all other states, please contact our CLE Department at  cle@aipla.org.  CLE credit may be available, but will require additional time for approval and CLE processing.


CLE Restrictions: 

ATTENTION attorneys in Louisiana, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Utah

These states mandate attorneys can only view a webinar independently at their own computer to receive CLE credit.  Multiple attendees prohibited.

ATTENTION attorneys in Alabama and Rhode Island

AIPLA does not submit courses for approval in Alabama or Rhode Island.  Attendees needing credit in these states may select the free, no CLE option to watch the webinar and use course materials and their certificate of attendance to request course approval directly from the State Bars. 

ATTENTION attorneys in Arizona

Arizona does not certify courses or providers. Arizona lawyers are required to independently review AZ's regulations and make their own determination that it qualifies for credit towards their MCLE requirements. MCLE Regulation 104(A) identifies the standards to apply.  AIPLA will email an attendance affidavit to registrants requesting AZ CLE credit after the webinar.

ATTENTION attorneys in New Hampshire

New Hampshire attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance according to NH Supreme Court Rule 53.  The New Hampshire Minimum Continuing Legal Education (NHMCLE) Board does not approve or accredit CLE activities for the NH Minimum CLE requirement. 

 

Disclaimer:  AIPLA is a nonprofit national bar association.  The sole purpose of this CLE program is to provide educational and informational content.  AIPLA does not provide legal services or advice.  The opinions, views and other statements expressed by contributors to this CLE program are solely those of the contributors.  These opinions, views and statements of the contributors do not necessarily represent those of AIPLA and should not be construed as such.

 

 

Add to:

 

 

News

  • Washington DC web IP Organizations Urge Congress to Extend USPTO Fee-Setting Authority and Restore Advisory Committee Operations

    September 28, 2026

    Alexandria, VA. September 28, 2026 – The American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA), Intellectual Property Owners Association (IPO), and International Trademark Association (INTA) urge the Senate IP Subcommittee to support an extension of the USPTO's fee-setting authority under Section 10 of the America Invents Act and to ensure vacancies on the Patent and Trademark Public Advisory Committees are filled promptly.
  • AIPLA Files Supreme Court Amicus Brief in RiseandShine v. PepsiCo

    September 18, 2026

    Alexandria, VA. September 15, 2026 – The American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) filed an amicus brief in RiseandShine Corp. v. PepsiCo, Inc., a case before the Supreme Court of the United States.
  • USPTOHouseLetter-12-1-21-logo AIPLA Joins IPO and INTA in Urging Extension of USPTO Fee-Setting Authority

    September 2, 2026

    Alexandria, VA. September 1, 2026 – The American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) joined the Intellectual Property Owners Association (IPO) and the International Trademark Association (INTA) in a letter to Congress supporting the extension of the USPTO’s fee-setting authority, which is set to expire on September 16, 2026. The organizations emphasized the importance of this authority in enabling the USPTO to fund operations, modernize its systems, and maintain efficient patent and trademark examination processes.
  • USPTO AIPLA Comments on Ex Parte Reexamination Requirements

    August 27, 2026

    Alexandria, VA. August 21, 2026 – The American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) submitted comments in response to the USPTO’s Notice of Proposed Rulemaking proposing to require identification of all real parties-in-interest (RPIs) in third-party ex parte reexamination requests.
  • AIPLA Comments to the Copyright Office on Alternative Fee Structures for Registration

    July 6, 2026

    Alexandria, VA. June 24, 2026 – The American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) submitted comments on the U.S. Copyright Office's Notice of Inquiry regarding alternative copyright registration fee structures.