2026 Electronic and Computer Patent Law Summit
June 10, 2026 9:00 AM to 5:00 PM
Location
Chicago, IL 60611-3308
Contact
Registration
Join leading practitioners, in-house counsel, and academics at the 2026 Electronic and Computer Patent Law Summit in Chicago for a dynamic, one-day program focused on the most pressing issues shaping patent practice today. This timely event brings together diverse perspectives to explore evolving USPTO priorities, recent case law developments, emerging challenges in semiconductor innovation, and the growing intersection of privacy, data security, and patent strategy. The day culminates in a forward-looking AI panel addressing inventorship, responsible use, and practical implications for both private practice and in-house teams, making this summit an essential forum for staying ahead in a rapidly changing legal and technological landscape.
Agenda Summary
9:00 AM - Priorities of the United States Patent and Trademark Office and Other Ongoing Efforts. Morning Kickoff & Industry Outlook
9:45 AM - In-House vs. Outside Counsel: Evidence from Patent Filing Decisions
10:45 AM - BREAK
11:00 - IP Implications of Trade Wars and Industrial Policy in the Semiconductor Sector
12:00 Noon - LUNCH
1:00 PM - Minds, Machines and Robots – Law and Ethics of Autonomous Systems
2:00 PM - BREAK
2:10 PM - Death of the IPR?
3:10 PM - BREAK
3:20 PM - AI Panel –AI inventorship; Responsible use of AI in the practice; Attorney training; Benefits/Pitfalls
5:10 PM - Networking Reception for all Attendees - Informal opportunity to connect with peers and speakers to close the day
VENUE
Doubletree by Hilton Hotel Chicago - Magnificent Mile
300 East Ohio St
Chicago, IL 60611, US
Room Rate: $289 + tax (18.9%) per night. Starting May 29, AIPLA has secured some rooms at the group rate for 6/9-6/11 that are available on a first come, first served basis. Please contact us at aipla@aipla.org if you need assistance with securing a room at the special group rate.
AIPLA does not contract with third party entities to book hotel accommodations. Please use the link above or contact the Doubletree by Hilton Hotel Chicago - Magnificent Mile - (312) 787-6100 and ask for the ECPLS rate.
Thank You to Our Sponsors!
Speakers
-
Anagnos, Themi
Aumovio | Head of IP for the Americas
Themi specializes in patent litigation management and claims management at Aumovio, formerly Continental Automotive. With 30 years of diverse experience spanning engineering, law firms, in-house roles, and academia, Themi has been at the forefront of innovation and intellectual property (IP) strategy. Themi has guided executive teams on critical business issues related to IP rights, licensing, and forward-looking IP strategies, including standards, patent litigation, and FRAND licensing. -
Barnes, Dunstan
McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP | Partner
Dunstan H. Barnes practices in all areas of intellectual property law with an emphasis on protecting and analyzing design rights. His work in that area includes drafting and prosecuting design patent applications and conducting opinion work and due diligence investigations. In addition, drawing on his doctorate work in materials science and metallurgy, Dr. Barnes has considerable experience drafting and prosecuting utility patent applications across a range of technological fields and industries. -
Chen, Sylvia
Google | Senior Counsel
As Google Senior Counsel, Sylvia works with firms and vendors worldwide to shepherd Google's patent portfolio. Prior to getting acquired by Google in 2014 and refining their panel of US law firms, Sylvia was a patent attorney at Motorola. Before going in-house, Sylvia worked as an associate attorney at Fulbright & Jaworski LLP (now Norton Rose Fulbright). She inadvertently entered the legal field after graduating from the University of Illinois at Urbana with a B.S. degree in electrical engineering and accepting a job at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Sylvia enjoys coaching law students and is functionally illiterate in Mandarin Chinese. -
Davenport, Joshua
Banner Witcoff | Principal Shareholder
Mr. Davenport is a Principal Shareholder of Banner Witcoff, and well-known as a leader in generative AI. He has done numerous talks on generative AI issues, given interviews for multiple publications, serves on the Customer Advisory Board of Solve Intelligence, and even applies machine-learning modeling techniques outside work as co-host of a major college football podcast. As a practitioner, he represents clients in all aspects of intellectual property matters, including patent prosecution, litigation, and counseling. He is currently on faculty at Georgetown University Law Center as an Adjunct Professor. -
Falkoff, Michelle
Northwestern Pritzker School of Law | Associate Dean and Professor of Law
Michelle Falkoff is the Associate Dean of Legal Writing and Instruction and William M. Trumbull Clinical Professor of Law at Northwestern Pritzker School of Law. She received her law degree from Columbia Law School and practiced intellectual property litigation in Silicon Valley before returning to school to receive her Master of Fine Arts in Fiction Writing from the Iowa Writers’ Workshop. -
Fano, Andrew
Northwestern's McCormick School of Engineering | Clinical Professor of Computer Science
Andrew Fano is Clinical Professor of Computer Science at Northwestern's McCormick School of Engineering and Director of the Northwestern MBAi program, a joint AI-focused MBA offered with the Kellogg School of Management. -
Ferraro, Matthew
Crowell & Moring | Partner
Matthew F. Ferraro is a partner in Crowell & Moring’s Privacy and Cybersecurity Group, where he helps clients address complex regulatory matters at the intersection of advanced technology, national security, and crisis management. He advises leading organizations on high-impact matters related to artificial intelligence (AI) and other emerging technologies, cyberattacks, domestic and international privacy compliance, internal investigations, foreign direct investment reviews, and high-stakes crises. -
Johns, Christopher
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP | Partner
Chris Johns manages drafting, prosecuting, and appealing patent applications related to multiple fields, including electronics, software, telecommunications, manufacturing, business methods, and other fields. He works with domestic and international clients on patent strategy. Chris has also litigated patents in multiple fields, in front of the USPTO, district courts, and the International Trade Commission (ITC). Before joining Finnegan, Chris served as a USPTO patent examiner for nearly five years. -
Merkin, Joel
GLS Capital | Managing Director
Joel Merkin serves as a Managing Director at GLS Capital – one of the world’s largest private investment firms focused on litigation finance – where he is responsible for due diligence and monitoring of patent investments. -
Nair, Gayatry
Conley Rose, P.C. | Principal
Gayatry Nair is a Principal at Conley Rose, P.C., where she focuses on the preparation and prosecution of domestic and foreign patent applications across a broad range of technologies, including computer science, electrical engineering, software, artificial intelligence, cloud computing, and telecommunications. She holds a B.S. in Computer Science from Southern Methodist University and a J.D. from Emory University School of Law. -
Oldach, William
Vorys | Partner
Bill Oldach is a partner in the Vorys Washington, D.C. office and a member of the Technology and Intellectual Property group. His practice focuses on patent and trademark litigation and appellate practice. Bill currently serves as Vice-Chair of AIPLA’s PTAB Trial Committee. He has litigated cases in many United States District Courts, as well as the U.S.P.T.O. Patent and Trademark Trial and Appeal Boards, and the United States International Trade Commission. In addition, Bill counsels clients on patent and trademark prosecution matters and on intellectual property aspects of corporate transactions. -
Parker, Usha
Perilla Knox & Hildebrandt | Partner
Usha Parker is a Partner at Perilla Knox & Hildebrandt, where her work focuses on patent application drafting and all aspects of prosecution. Usha has drafted applications directed to wireless (cellular, V2X, satellite) communication systems, electronic circuits and interconnects, optical systems, automotive sensor and processing systems, medical and consumer devices, mechanical designs, and software. In addition, she has written numerous articles on different aspects of patent procurement, including strategies for addressing patentability-based (§ 101) rejections. -
Phelan, Ryan N.
Marshall, Gerstein & Borun LLP | Partner
Ryan N. Phelan is a registered U.S. patent attorney who counsels and works with clients in all areas of intellectual property (IP), with a focus on patents. As a former technology consultant with Accenture and with a background in computer science and engineering, Ryan has extensive experience in computer system, hardware, and software design, engineering, development and related technologies. He represents numerous startup and Fortune 500 clients with patent matters in technical areas and industries including artificial intelligence and machine learning, autonomous vehicles, robotics, among others. -
Reilly, Greg
Illinois Tech Chicago-Kent College of Law | Professor of Law
Professor Reilly is a Professor of Law and Co-Director of the Intellectual Property Law Program at Illinois Tech Chicago-Kent College of Law, where his research and teaching focus on the intersection of patent law and federal courts, with particular emphasis on how institutions and decision makers resolve patent disputes. He graduated from Harvard Law School and clerked for Judge Timothy B. Dyk of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit before spending five years litigating patent cases at Morrison & Foerster LLP. His scholarship has been published in the Boston University, Southern California, Washington University, and Notre Dame law reviews, among others. -
Richards, Alison
Global IP Law Group, LLC | Attorney
Alison has been helping inventors protect investments in their inventions for over 20 years. She holds a law degree from Harvard Law School and has extensive courtroom and trial experience. She is a member of the Northern District of Illinois Trial Bar and has litigated cases in the Eastern, Western and Northern Districts of Texas, the District of Delaware, the Northern District of Illinois, and the Southern, Central and Northern Districts of California. She has successfully argued before the Federal Circuit. She has also successfully represented patent owners in multiple IPR proceedings and has won in PTAB IPR trials. -
Schwartz, David L.
Northwestern Pritzker School of Law | William G. and Virginia K. Karnes Research Professor of Law
Professor Schwartz is the William G. and Virginia K. Karnes Research Professor of Law at Northwestern Pritzker School of Law, where he focuses his teaching and research on intellectual property and patent law with a particular emphasis on empirical studies of patents. He has authored or co-authored more than 30 articles and co-authored a casebook on design law, and he serves as Co-Principal Investigator of the NSF-funded SCALES Open Knowledge Network, which works to improve transparency and accessibility of federal court records. Prior to entering academia, Professor Schwartz practiced patent law for over a decade, including as a partner at two IP boutique firms in Chicago. -
Thompson, Andrew
EIP | Partner
Andrew is a UK and European Patent Attorney who has spent 25 years working in the patent profession. His focus is on electronics, semiconductors and software. He was worked for various semiconductor and technology companies from around the world, from multinationals to start-ups. His practice covers patent drafting and prosecution, and litigation support. He also provides strategic IP advice, especially to start-ups and scale-ups. Andrew heads up EIP’s Ampliphy service, which offers strategic IP advice to companies in the electronics, semiconductor and photonics sectors. He also writes and presents regularly on IP developments in the semiconductor world, and has a particular interest in the impact of geopolitics on innovation and supply chains.
News
-
Supreme Court Issues Unanimous Decision in Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. v. Amarin Pharma, Inc.
June 4, 2026
On June 4, 2026, the Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. v. Amarin Pharma, Inc. While the Court reaffirmed existing law on pleading standards, it reversed the Federal Circuit’s decision that had focused on how relevant statements could be understood by medical providers as instructions to infringe. The amicus brief filed by AIPLA on March 27, 2026, advocated for affirmance and cautioned the Court not to change the patent infringement pleading standard or adopt any categorical exemption from inducement for a particular industry. -
AIPLA Submits Comments to the USPTO on 2026 Supplemental GUI Guidance
May 15, 2026
Arlington, VA. May 12, 2026 – The American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) submitted comments to the USPTO on its Supplemental Guidance for Examination of Design Patent Applications Related to Computer-Generated Interfaces and Icons, issued on March 13, 2026. -
AIPLA Comments on the Copyright Office's Proposed Fee Schedule Adjustment
May 8, 2026
Arlington, VA. May 1, 2026 – The American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) submitted comments in response to the U.S. Copyright Office’s Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on adjustments to its fee schedule. -
AIPLA Submits Comments on the Enlarged Board of Appeal’s 11 Preliminary Opinion in G 1/25
May 1, 2026
Arlington, VA. April 17, 2026 – The American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) submitted comments on the Enlarged Board of Appeal’s 11 March 2026 preliminary opinion in G 1/25, addressing whether patent descriptions must be adapted following claim amendments. -
AIPLA Files Amicus Brief in Range of Motion Products, LLC v. Armaid Company Inc.
April 20, 2026
Arlington, VA — April 17, 2026 — The American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) filed an amicus curiae brief with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Range of Motion Products, LLC v. Armaid Company Inc., No. 23-2427, supporting rehearing and rehearing en banc. AIPLA urges the Court to restore clarity to design patent law by (1) reaffirming that Gorham v. White (1871) provides the sole governing test for infringement and forecloses any separate “plainly dissimilar” threshold, and (2) confirming that claim construction may not be used to exclude any visual portions of the overall claimed design.
