AIPLA Committee Webinar: Intellectual Property, Technology and International Dispute Resolution

November 13, 2024 8:00 PM to 9:30 PM

Credits

No CLE

Registration

Fee: Free, Members Only

Register Now

 

AIPLA Member Exclusive Webinar!

The AIPLA IP Practice in the Asia Pacific Committee, in coordination with the AIPLA Online Programs Committee, is proud to announce: Webinar on Intellectual Property, Technology and International Dispute Resolution

This webinar will explore the importance of considering different dispute resolution options in resolving high stakes intellectual property and technology disputes, which is often overlooked.  In particular, the speakers will discuss the benefits of choosing Singapore (whether arbitration, mediation or litigation) to resolve your IP and Tech disputes.  The Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC) has been ranked as the most preferred arbitral institution in Asia Pacific and 2nd among the world’s top five arbitral institutions.  The webinar will delve into IP dispute resolution in SIAC, as well as via the Singapore International Mediation Centre (SIMC), and the Singapore International Commercial Court (SICC).

 This program, featuring speakers from government, international organizations, and industry, will offer a practical discussion of relevant considerations to be taken into account, including the advantages and disadvantages of the various IP dispute resolution options, focusing on offerings from Singapore.

Speakers:


Dr. Stanley Lai, SC
, Allen & Gledhill – Singapore, Head of the Firm’s Intellectual Property Practice and Co-Head of the Cybersecurity & Data Protection Practice

Adriana Uson, Director and Head (Americas) of the Singapore International Arbitration Center (SIAC)

This is a free, members only webinar.  Not eligible for CLE credit.

Add to:

 

 

News

  • TermDisc-Comments-March21-logo AIPLA Submits Comments to the USPTO on 2026 Supplemental GUI Guidance

    May 15, 2026

    Arlington, VA. May 12, 2026 – The American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) submitted comments to the USPTO on its Supplemental Guidance for Examination of Design Patent Applications Related to Computer-Generated Interfaces and Icons, issued on March 13, 2026.
  • AIPLA Comments on the Copyright Office's Proposed Fee Schedule Adjustment

    May 8, 2026

    Arlington, VA. May 1, 2026 – The American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) submitted comments in response to the U.S. Copyright Office’s Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on adjustments to its fee schedule.
  • TermDisc-Comments-March21-logo AIPLA Submits Comments on the Enlarged Board of Appeal’s 11 Preliminary Opinion in G 1/25

    May 1, 2026

    Arlington, VA. April 17, 2026 – The American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) submitted comments on the Enlarged Board of Appeal’s 11 March 2026 preliminary opinion in G 1/25, addressing whether patent descriptions must be adapted following claim amendments.
  • Supreme Court AIPLA Files Amicus Brief in Range of Motion Products, LLC v. Armaid Company Inc.

    April 20, 2026

    Arlington, VA — April 17, 2026 — The American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) filed an amicus curiae brief with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Range of Motion Products, LLC v. Armaid Company Inc., No. 23-2427, supporting rehearing and rehearing en banc. AIPLA urges the Court to restore clarity to design patent law by (1) reaffirming that Gorham v. White (1871) provides the sole governing test for infringement and forecloses any separate “plainly dissimilar” threshold, and (2) confirming that claim construction may not be used to exclude any visual portions of the overall claimed design.
  • TermDisc-Comments-March21-logo AIPLA Comments on CNIPA Draft Measures for Prioritized Patent Examination

    April 1, 2026

    Arlington, VA. March 30, 2026 – The American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) submitted comments to the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) regarding the Draft Measures for the Administration of Prioritized Examination of Patents.