2021 Virtual Patent Trial and Appeal Board Bench & Bar

August 5, 2021 1:00 PM to 5:30 PM

Location

Virtual

Credits

No CLE

Registration

Fee: No Fee

Register Now

Engage Directly with PTAB Leaders and Judge.  Gain an edge with this update on the latest at the PTAB.

The 2021 VIRTUAL Patent Trial and Appeal Board Bench & Bar program will be an informative, interactive program covering topics including practical guidance for AIA trials and ex parte appeals, as well as various PTAB initiatives. You can choose topics that interest you and engage with fellow practitioners and USPTO personnel in a series of smaller group settings. After learning about the latest developments in PTAB practice, stay for the networking session so you can connect with fellow practitioners and USPTO personnel.

The PTAB Bench & Bar program will be a four-hour program designed for new and experienced practitioners who want useful, timely content to help them in their practice before the PTAB, so they can give their best to their clients.

This event is free to attend. CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

AGENDA

1:00-1:20 pm ET: Welcome and Opening Remarks (20 min)

  • Dave Gosse, Fitch Even Tabin & Flannery and Chair of PTAB Trial Committee of AIPLA
  • Drew Hirshfeld, Performing the Functions and Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the USPTO (Invited)

1:20-2:05: Breakouts #1 (45 min)

Attendees should select one of the following three break-out options when registering.

Option #1: Motions to Amend in AIA Trial Proceedings -- This session will provide an overview of the motion to amend pilot program and usage. Participants will consider various aspects of the pilot and how to improve the program.

  • Lead Judge Jessica Kaiser, PTAB
  • Trenton Ward, Finnegan Henderson Farabow Garrett & Dunner LLP

Option #2: Medley AIA Trial Considerations -- Prior art, how to prove it up, how to punch holes – discuss evidentiary motions to strike, motions for supplemental discovery, and rule changes re: burden of proof. This session will address several aspects of AIA trial proceedings including how to establish that a reference constitutes prior art for use in an AIA trial.

  • Senior Lead Judge Kal Deshpande, PTAB
  • Lead Judge Scott Moore, PTAB
  • Bridget Smith Lowenstein & Weatherwax LLP

Option #3: Recent developments in Ex Parte Appeals -- This session will cover new initiatives that the PTAB has released to expedited ex parte appeals as well as provide recent statistics on the outcome of appeals before the Board. Participates will consider example fact patterns and advise hypothetical clients on which initiatives to use to achieve certain strategies.

  • Judge Eric Jescke, PTAB
  • Judge Mike Cygan, PTAB,
  • Patent Attorney Tom Volper, PTAB
  • Sal Bezos, Sterne Kessler Goldstein & Fox and Vice Chair of the PTAB Trial Committee of AIPLA

2:05-2:15: Break (10 min)

2:15-2:45: Practical Tips for Oral Argument (30 min)

Practitioners and judges will discuss how they prepare for arguments—the weeks before, the day before, and the day of the argument.

  • Lead Judge Georgianna Braden, PTAB
  • Lead Judge Phil Kauffman, PTAB
  • Dave Gosse, Fitch Even Tabin & Flannery and Chair of PTAB Committee

2:45-3:15: Arthrex and the New, Interim Director Review Process (30 min)

Practitioners and judge will discuss the Supreme Court’s decision in Arthrex, the creation of a new, interim process for Director Reviews of final written decisions in AIA trial proceedings, and strategies for taking advantage of this process.

  • Vice Chief Judge Scott Weidenfeller, PTAB
  • Senior Lead Judge Kal Deshpande, PTAB
  • Dave Gosse, Fitch Even Tabin & Flannery and Chair of PTAB Subcommittee

3:15-3:45: Breakouts #2 (30 min)

Attendees should select one of the following three break-out options when registering.

Option #1: Legal Experience and Advancement Program or LEAP -- This session will provide an introduction to the Legal Experience and Advancement Program, the benefits of using this program, and training opportunities available through the program.

  • Judge Amanda Wieker, PTAB
  • Lead Judge Stacey White, PTAB
  • Judge Kristi Sawert, PTAB
  • Tim Tang, Sterne Kessler Goldstein & Fox
  • Tyler Del Rosario, Sughrue Mion PLLC
  • Greg Israelsen, WilmerHale

Option #2: Expanding American Innovation -- This session will present an overview of the National Council for Expanding American Innovation, its mission, and what you can do to get involved in promoting innovation for under-resourced innovators.

  • Valenica Martin Wallace, Deputy Commissioner for Patents and Executive Lead for the National Council for Expanding American Innovation (NCEAI)

Option #3: Diversity in the IP Community -- This session will consider diversity in the IP community and ways in which law firms, corporations, and the government are changing.

  • Lead Judge Chris Paulraj, PTAB
  • Supervisory Patent Attorney Krista Flanagan, PTAB
  • Palash Basu, Nixon Peabody
  • Terry Rea, Crowell & Moring

3:45-3:55: Break (10 min)

3:55-4:15: Fireside Chat and Closing Remarks (20 min)

  • Chief Judge Scott Boalick, PTAB
    • Sal Bezos, Sterne Kessler Goldstein & Fox and Vice Chair of the PTAB Trial Committee of AIPLA

4:15-5:00: Networking (45 min)

This event is free to attend. There is no CLE.

Add to:

 

 

News

  • TermDisc-Comments-March21-logo AIPLA Comments on CNIPA Draft Measures for Prioritized Patent Examination

    April 1, 2026

    Arlington, VA. March 30, 2026 – The American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) submitted comments to the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) regarding the Draft Measures for the Administration of Prioritized Examination of Patents.
  • AIPLA Files Amicus Brief in Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. v. Amarin Pharma, Inc

    March 31, 2026

    Arlington, VA. March 27, 2026 – The American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) filed an amicus curiae brief with the Supreme Court in Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. v. Amarin Pharma, Inc., No. 24-889. AIPLA urges the Court to affirm the Federal Circuit’s application of the established Iqbal/Twombly pleading standard and inducement law in reviewing Hikma’s motion to dismiss Amarin’s claim that Hikma’s conduct, in combination with its “skinny label,” induced infringement of Amarin’s patented treatment methods.
  • Supreme Court Issues Unanimous Decision in Cox Communications, Inc. v. Sony Music Entertainment

    March 25, 2026

    On March 25, 2026, the Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in Cox Communications, Inc. v. Sony Music Entertainment. The majority opinion limits contributory liability to situations where a party intended that its service be used for infringement, either by affirmatively inducing infringement or by selling a service tailored to infringement. A concurring opinion by Justice Sotomayor argues that the material contribution test should be retained, and that other forms of secondary liability can be found, which is consistent with the position asserted by AIPLA in its amicus brief filed on September 5, 2025. To read the opinion of the Court, please click here.
  • Writing AIPLA Comments on the Draft Trademark Law of the People’s Republic of China

    March 23, 2026

    Arlington, VA. February 9, 2026 – The American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) submitted comments to the Legislative Affairs Commission of the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress regarding the latest Draft Trademark Law of the People’s Republic of China. AIPLA recognized the NPC’s efforts to streamline trademark procedures, strengthen protection, and address abusive and bad-faith filing practices.
  • AIPLA Files Amicus Brief in USAA v. PNC Bank

    March 3, 2026

    Arlington, VA. March 2, 2026 – The American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) filed an amicus brief with the Supreme Court in USAA v. PNC Bank, N.A., No. 25-853, in support of USAA’s petition for certiorari, urging the Court to provide much-needed guidance to address the unpredictable and overly broad application of the judicial exceptions to patent-eligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101, particularly the “abstract idea” exception.