Practice Innovation Webinar Series: In-House Patent Practice Innovation

January 12, 2021 12:30 PM to 12:00 AM

In-house thought leaders discuss how corporations are modernizing with technology and operations innovation; what matters most w/r/t outside counsel's tech adoption, efficiency, service level, and consistency in quality of service and work product; and whether outside counsel's adoption of tech impacts firm selection.

 
Presented by:  Alan Chang of DexCom;  Jennifer Russell of NuVasive; Jeff Fougere of HPE; and moderated by : Gabe Sukman of ClearstoneIP
 
 
 
 
 

Add to:

 

 

News

  • TermDisc-Comments-March21-logo AIPLA Submits Comments to the USPTO on 2026 Supplemental GUI Guidance

    May 15, 2026

    Arlington, VA. May 12, 2026 – The American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) submitted comments to the USPTO on its Supplemental Guidance for Examination of Design Patent Applications Related to Computer-Generated Interfaces and Icons, issued on March 13, 2026.
  • AIPLA Comments on the Copyright Office's Proposed Fee Schedule Adjustment

    May 8, 2026

    Arlington, VA. May 1, 2026 – The American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) submitted comments in response to the U.S. Copyright Office’s Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on adjustments to its fee schedule.
  • TermDisc-Comments-March21-logo AIPLA Submits Comments on the Enlarged Board of Appeal’s 11 Preliminary Opinion in G 1/25

    May 1, 2026

    Arlington, VA. April 17, 2026 – The American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) submitted comments on the Enlarged Board of Appeal’s 11 March 2026 preliminary opinion in G 1/25, addressing whether patent descriptions must be adapted following claim amendments.
  • Supreme Court AIPLA Files Amicus Brief in Range of Motion Products, LLC v. Armaid Company Inc.

    April 20, 2026

    Arlington, VA — April 17, 2026 — The American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) filed an amicus curiae brief with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Range of Motion Products, LLC v. Armaid Company Inc., No. 23-2427, supporting rehearing and rehearing en banc. AIPLA urges the Court to restore clarity to design patent law by (1) reaffirming that Gorham v. White (1871) provides the sole governing test for infringement and forecloses any separate “plainly dissimilar” threshold, and (2) confirming that claim construction may not be used to exclude any visual portions of the overall claimed design.
  • TermDisc-Comments-March21-logo AIPLA Comments on CNIPA Draft Measures for Prioritized Patent Examination

    April 1, 2026

    Arlington, VA. March 30, 2026 – The American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) submitted comments to the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) regarding the Draft Measures for the Administration of Prioritized Examination of Patents.