 
 
 Federal Trade Commission
- 
            
                AIPLA Supplemental Comments on FTC Hearings on Competition and Consumer Protection in the 21st Century: Discussion of Innovation and IP Policy
            
            December 21, 2018 AIPLA understands antitrust enforcers sometimes refer to “innovation” as “dynamic competition.” We commend modern U.S. antitrust law for recognizing that “competition” and “innovation” are generally synonymous, and that innovation-based competition is equally as important as themore traditional static “price competition”.
- 
            
                AIPLA Supplemental AIPLA Comments on Competition and Consumer Protection in the 21st Century Hearings
            
            August 20, 2018 AIPLA encourages the FTC to be sensitive to the special role of patents and other forms of intellectual property in fostering innovation that is the lifeblood of the U.S. economy, thereby enhancing competition in the U.S. and globally.
- 
            
                AIPLA Comments Regarding Proposed Consent Agreement in MPHJ Technology Investments, LLC, et al.
            
            December 8, 2014 While AIPLA in general supports economically efficient licensing of patents and intellectual property assets in general, and has cautioned against overbroad reactions to new market entrants and licensing models, we have expressed appropriate concerns about indiscriminate demand letters sent in bad faith.
- 
            
                AIPLA Comments to FTC and OMB Regarding Revised PAE Study
            
            June 18, 2014 The American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) respectfully submits this letter in response to the Federal Trade Commission’s second Federal Register notice (“the Second Notice”), dated May 13, 2014, regarding proposed information requests to so-called “patent assertion entities” (PAEs) and other entities asserting patents in the wireless communications sector. 79 Fed. Reg. 28715.
- 
            
                AIPLA Comments to FTC on Section 6(b) PAE Report
            
            December 16, 2013 AIPLA Comments to FTC on Section 6(b) PAE Report
- 
            
                AIPLA Comments to FTC/DOJ on the FTC/DOJ December 10, 2012, "Patent Assertion Entity Activities Workshop,"
            
            April 5, 2013 AIPLA Comments to FTC/DOJ on the FTC/DOJ December 10, 2012, "Patent Assertion Entity Activities Workshop,"
- 
            
                AIPLA Comments on the Decision and Proposed Consent Order in the Google Proceeding
            
            February 22, 2013 AIPLA Comments on the Decision and Proposed Consent Order in the Google Proceeding
- 
            
                AIPLA Comments on the Decision and Proposed Consent Order In re Robert Bosch GmbH, FTC File No.121-0081
            
            December 20, 2012 AIPLA Comments on the Decision and Proposed Consent Order In re Robert Bosch GmbH, FTC File No.121-0081
- 
            
                AIPLA Comments on Standards-Setting Issues In Connection with Patent Standards Workshop
            
            June 14, 2011 AIPLA Comments on Standards-Setting Issues In Connection with Patent Standards Workshop
- 
            
                AIPLA Comments on Section 5 Workshop
            
            October 24, 2008 AIPLA Comments on Section 5 Workshop
- 
            
                AIPLA Response to the Decision and Proposed Consent Order in the N-Data proceeding
            
            April 5, 2008 AIPLA Response to the Decision and Proposed Consent Order in the N-Data proceeding
Recent Advocacy
- 
            AIPLA Comments to Copyright Office on Group Registration of Two-Dimensional Artwork
            April 2, 2024 Arlington, VA. April 1, 2024 - The American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) submitted comments in response to the U.S. Copyright Office's Notice of Proposed Rulemaking related to group registration of two-dimensional artwork.
- 
            AIPLA Files Amicus Brief with the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Google LLC v. Sonos, Inc.
            March 21, 2024 Arlington, VA. February 29, 2024 - The American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) filed an amicus brief in support of neither party with the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Google LLC v. Sonos, Inc., a case on appeal from the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The district court held that the post-GATT patents-in-suit are unenforceable under the doctrine of prosecution laches and found unreasonable and inexcusable delay where 13 years had elapsed between the provisional patent application and presenting the claims at issue.
- 
            AIPLA Comments to Copyright Office on Group Registration of Updates to a News Website
            February 22, 2024 Arlington, VA. February 20, 2024 - The American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) submitted comments in response to the U.S. Copyright Office's Notice of Proposed Rulemaking related to group registration of updates to a news website.
- 
            AIPLA Comments to HHS on WHO Pandemic Treaty
            February 8, 2024 Arlington, VA. January 31, 2024 - The American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) submitted comments in response to the RFC on Implications of Access and Benefit Sharing (ABS) Commitments/Regimes and Other Proposed Commitments in the World Health Organization (WHO) Pandemic Agreement.
