innovatewebbanner2
Home / News & Publications

INNOVATE Magazine

INNOVATE is the online magazine by and for AIPLA members from IP law students all the way through retired practitioners. Designed as an online publication, INNOVATE features magazine-like articles on a wide variety of topics in IP law.

The views and opinions expressed in these articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or positions of AIPLA.

Articles

In This Section

  • Investing in Africa: Opportunities, Challenges, and Smart Trademark Strategies for Brand Owners

    Written by Chinwe Ogban on June 4, 2026

    Africa is rapidly positioning itself as the world’s next major growth market. With the World Bank projecting Sub-Saharan Africa’s economy to accelerate from about 3.5% growth in 2025 to an average of 4.3% in 2026–271, alongside a population expected to nearly double to 2.5 billion by 2050 2, the continent presents an unparalleled frontier for investment and brand expansion.
  • Securing Autonomous Drone Logistics: What IP Practitioners Need to Know About AI-Driven UAV Systems

    Written by Praveen Manimangalam on June 4, 2026

    Autonomous drone logistics has moved rapidly from experimental pilot programs to operational reality. Drones are increasingly deployed for emergency medical delivery, disaster response, infrastructure inspection, and time-critical logistics. As artificial intelligence (AI) increasingly governs how these systems prioritize missions, navigate constrained airspace, and secure sensitive payloads, intellectual property (IP) considerations have become both more complex and more valuable.
  • Beyond Patents: Reframing Your IP Practice for Defense Contractor Clients

    Written by Linda Kennedy on June 4, 2026

    Many young IP lawyers begin their practice fluent in a familiar framework: patents, trademarks, copyrights, and trade secrets. That framework serves most commercial clients well. It emphasizes ownership, validity, and enforcement. These are the traditional pillars of intellectual property practice.
  • Reassessing PTAB Adjudication Post-Jarkesy

    Written by Dax Sotero on June 4, 2026

    The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Securities and Exchange Commission v. Jarkesy (2024) revived the Seventh Amendment as a structural limit on administrative adjudication. As Steve Vladeck observes in One First, Jarkesy is part of a line of other recent decisions such as Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo (2024) and Ohio v. EPA (2024) that collectively “destabilize” the administrative state.
  • Patentability of Circulating Tumor DNA, An Emerging Tool in Precision Technology and Cancer Research

    Written by Sofia MakePeace on June 4, 2026

    Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as one of the most promising tools in modern oncology.[1] Unlike traditional tissue biopsies, ctDNA-based “liquid biopsies” allow clinicians to detect and monitor cancer using a simple fluid sample.[2] By identifying fragments of tumor DNA outside the cell, these tests can reveal genetic information about a malignancy in a minimally invasive manner.[3] Presently, liquid biopsies are most reliably used to guide targeted therapies, assess patent treatment response, including drug resistance, and identify recurrence, sometimes months before radiographic evidence would appear.
  • Licensing the Soundtrack of the Feed: Music Rights in the Age of Streaming and Social Media

    Written by Rutu Patel on June 4, 2026

    The digital economy has completely changed how music licensing works. Now, every time you navigate, press, or submit anything, you might be breaking copyright. Social media sites have changed the way people find and utilize music, whether it's as background music for short videos, interactive filters, or live-stream backgrounds. But there is still a problem with licensing: how to balance old copyright rules with the free, open, and participatory nature of digital culture. For the last ten years, judges, regulators, and the industry itself have had a hard time changing licensing rules to keep up with the speed and size of platforms like TikTok, Instagram Reels, and YouTube Shorts.[1] These systems depend a lot on integrated music databases and complicated blanket agreements that are meant to keep the stream going. However, what they mean for authors, copyright owners, and middlemen is still up in the air.
  • A Push for the Standardization of Chemical Scope in Patent Specifications

    Written by Aliza Panjwani on June 4, 2026

    A fundamental component of conducting patentability and freedom-to-operate searches is generating and searching for like terms for keywords provided in an invention disclosure form. Traditional methods for finding alternative words, such as synonyms or stemming, may be used to identify all manners of describing mechanical devices or methods. An example search for a housing may be entered into programs such as Derwent, PatSnap, or TotalPatentOne as (hous* OR cover OR enclos* OR shield* OR “outer ”), which may reasonably be expected to return a vast majority of documents describing a housing.
  • Selection Inventions in the U.S.: Novelty, Obviousness, and Written Description in a Tightening Landscape

    Written by Samantha Page on June 4, 2026

    Selection inventions occupy a familiar space in U.S. patent practice: the claim targets a specific species, subgenus, formulation, or numerical sub-range that lies within a broader disclosure. In the chemical and materials arts in particular, business-relevant innovation is often found not in an entirely new class of compounds or compositions, but in identifying which members of a known field deliver a materially improved result.
  • Building and Managing Patent Portfolios in Brazil: Strategy, Institutional Constraints, and Value Creation in the Context of IP Finance

    Written by Ana Cristina Müller and Lilian Ghitnick Arcalji on June 4, 2026

    The Brazilian patent system presents a set of technical, procedural, and institutional characteristics that directly influence the way patent portfolios are built, managed, and monetized. While patents are recognized under Brazilian law as transferable assets capable of economic exploitation, transforming patent rights into value-generating assets requires far more than filing and obtaining patent grants.
  • Protected? A Look at Trademark Law's Landmark Decisions Applied to Sports Video Game

    Written by Louis Juliano & Olivia Farneski on June 4, 2026

    The rise of digital media, especially in sports video games, has complicated the scope and enforcement of trademark law. Sports video games are a growing cultural phenomenon. Many gamers have envisioned playing as a world-class athlete.
  • The Hidden IP Risks Inside the Manufacturing Floor

    Written by Gregory Stone on June 4, 2026

    When IP counsel sits down with manufacturing clients, the conversation usually centers on patent portfolios, freedom-to-operate analyses, and product designs. But some of the most valuable, and the most vulnerable, intellectual property inside a manufacturing organization has nothing to do with the product itself.
  • AI in Patent Law Careers

    Written by Dustin Lee on June 4, 2026

    Artificial intelligence is disrupting the traditional entry points of the legal profession.[1] Executives now use AI to handle the mechanical review tasks of their attorneys.[2] This shift directs legal spending toward high-value, personal counsel, which should hit close to home for patent practitioners. For the new associate or law student, this change is a severe pressure on career paths. But they are not novel pressures, and neither are the solutions. Practitioners who align their practice to this disruptive reality will navigate their careers forward.
  • Beating Alice: Claim Strategies for AI and Software Patents

    Written by Tim Bright on June 4, 2026

    For practitioners working with artificial intelligence and software innovators, Section 101 patent eligibility represents the most significant barrier to intellectual property protection. One practitioner analysis of Federal Circuit decisions reported that the court found claims eligible under Section 101 in only one of 22 substantive patent cases in 2024. If accurate, those figures would reflect a 95.5% ineligibility rate for software patents on appeal.
  • Does This Web Dress Make My Site Look Distinctive?

    Written by Joe Schuler on June 4, 2026

    This article discusses the legal landscape surrounding liability under the Lanham Act and under the New York General Business Law for mimicking the trade dress of a competitor’s website. It also addresses the practicalities of acquiring jurisdiction over a defendant.
  • Mind and Machine: Navigating the Intellectual Property and Geopolitical Frontiers of Brain-Computer Interfaces

    Written by Natasha Voros Alvarado on June 4, 2026

    As Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs) transition from clinical trials to the consumer market, they are creating a high-stakes frontier for intellectual property law and national security. This article examines the critical patentability hurdles under Section 101, the emerging litigation risks of "neural mandates" in the workplace, and the intensifying global race to protect human neural data. By bridging technical architecture with geopolitical risk, the piece provides a roadmap for practitioners navigating the "wetware" era of legal practice.
  • When Logos Go Quiet: Design Patents and the New Language of Luxury

    Written by Donny Barrios-Mason on December 12, 2025

    While fashion is a global industry, this article focuses primarily on U.S. design-patent and trade-dress protection, with comparative notes on European Union design law. The distinction matters: the United States places greater emphasis on design patents and the limits imposed by §43(a) of the Lanham Act (15 U.S.C. § 1125(a)), while the European Union offers immediate, automatic protection through unregistered Community design rights (UCDs). As “quiet luxury” shifts brand identity away from logos and toward silhouette, craftsmanship, and construction, understanding how these two systems diverge has become essential. This legal conversation is unfolding against a fragmented market backdrop. The Row reached a $1 billion valuation in 2024, and Brunello Cucinelli outperformed its peers despite a difficult year for luxury. Meanwhile, Gucci saw a 26% revenue drop, and LVMH posted its first decline in five years. Increasingly, the brands gaining market share are those protecting their design language rather than their logos.
  • The Dual Edge: Navigating Generative AI’s Professional and Cyber Liability Risks for IP Law Firms

    Written by Jeff Roth on December 12, 2025

    In the specialized, high-stakes domain of Intellectual Property (IP) law, the rapid integration of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) and other advanced machine learning tools is moving from a competitive advantage to a fundamental operational requirement. These tools promise revolutionary efficiency in core IP tasks—from initial prior art review and complex claim drafting analysis to trademark clearance and litigation strategy development.
  • Navigating the Dual Copyright System in Commercial Music Licensing

    Written by Siddhant Sharma on December 12, 2025

    The commercial utilization of music today is defined by a fundamental flaw: the widespread confusion between a personal streaming license and the necessary Public Performance Right. For business owners, this misconception is not a trivial oversight; it is a critical source of high-figure liability, transforming a standard business practice into a treacherous path of copyright non-compliance.
  • Subject Matter Eligibility of Artificial Intelligence and the Problems with a Functionally Drafted Patent

    Written by Michael Kiklis on December 12, 2025

    Although Artificial Intelligence has been the focus of research since the 1950s, only recently has it become a mainstream topic, discussed and utilized by many. In fact, no one can doubt that AI has become the big hope for future economic gains.
  • The Crossroad of India’s Trademark and Copyright Law

    Written by Mohan Dewan on December 12, 2025

    The protections offered by India’s trademark law and copyright law serve different public policy goals. Trademark law is based on protecting goodwill, avoiding consumer confusion and identifying the source of origin of the goods or services in question. Whereas copyright law encourages authorship and creativity. Even though these areas are separate in theory, they often and inevitably come to a crossroad during their commercial use, especially when an artistic work is used as a logo or in a label which is applied to an article for sale.

 

 

Please login to see the content.
Register now

Innovate Volume 20 Timeline

submit articles to innovate@aipla.org

Submission Window Open

January 2, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 10, 2026

Publication Date

June 23, 2026


 

About

Publishing an article to INNOVATE is a great way for AIPLA members to build their brand by increasing recognition among peers and setting themselves apart as thought leaders in the IP industry.

Any current AIPLA member in good standing may submit an article for consideration in INNOVATE throughout the year. IP law students are especially encouraged to submit articles for publication.

Articles submitted to innovate@aipla.org are reviewed by an ad-hoc sub-committee of volunteers from AIPLA's Fellows Committee, and other AIPLA peers. 

Don’t miss your chance to be published with AIPLA’s INNOVATE! Email your article submission to innovate@aipla.org to be considered for the next edition.

For more information please review the Guidelines for INNOVATE Article Submission and the INNOVATE Author Acknowledgement Letter for guidelines and terms of article submission and publication.