News & Publications

Find our latest news and analysis here. From the daily Newsstand to the Quarterly Journal, we cover the full breadth of intellectual property law. 

 

Written June 17, 2019

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on June 13, 2019, vacated and remanded a Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) decision which had invalidated Power Integrations’ Patent No. 6,212,079 (the ’079 patent) because the inter partes review (IPR) was time-barred under § 315(b). Power Integrations, Inc. v. Semiconductor Components, Fed. Cir., No. 18-01607, 6/13/19.

Power Integrations argued that the IPR was time-barred by § 315(b) because Fairchild, a barred party, was an admitted real party in interest (RPI) before institution.

The Board in this case held that RPI and privity relationships for purposes of the§ 315(b) time-bar are only relevant up to the date the petition is filed. The Court agreed with Power Integrations’ reading of 315(b), saying that it requires consideration of privity and real party in interest (RPI) relationships arising after filing the petition but before the institution of it.

Media Contact

Ariella Gordon

agordon@aipla.org

703-415-0780

 

 

Broadcast Opportunities

Looking for opportunities to get published? Submit your work to the AIPLA Quarterly Journal or AIPLA Innovate Magazine

 

 

Exhibitor and Sponsorship Opportunities

Highlight your brand at a premier intellectual property law event, webinar, podcast, or in one of our publications.

For rates, availability, or additional details, click here or contact:

Meghan Donohoe
COO
American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA)
T| +1.703.415.1343
E| mdonohoe@aipla.org