Quarterly Journal 51-1 Volume 51, Issue 1 June 2023

Please sign in to view the articles. Once you've signed in please refresh the page to see the download link. 
The AIPLA Quarterly Journal, a publication of the American Intellectual Property Law Association, is housed at the George Washington University Law School and is edited and managed by an Editorial Board of intellectual property experts and a staff of law students under the direction of the Editor-in-Chief, Professor Joan Schaffner.

The Quarterly Journal is dedicated to presenting materials relating to intellectual property matters and is published four times per year. Editorial Board members (all of whom are lawyers) are selected based upon demonstrated interest and experience, and student staff members are selected from the students of the GWU Law School.
QJ-49-3-Leijon QJ 51.1 - Machine Learning: An Alternative Approach to the Copyright Infringement Question

Jake Glendenning

 

Machine Learning is a powerful software tool that relies on digital copying. Whether such copying constitutes copyright infringement is not clear. So far, scholarship on whether machine learning constitutes copyright infringement has focused heavily on whether the “fair use” exception to copyright infringement applies to machine learning. Neither scholarship nor case law has provided a clear answer to whether machine learning is fair use.

 

However, case law can help determine whether machine learning is infringing in the first place, providing clarity on whether machine learning infringes copyright in some cases where fair use is of little help. Some circuits have held that digital copying, like the copying that takes place in machine learning, necessarily constitutes copyright infringement, while others have interpreted the Copyright Act such that digital copying can sometimes take place without infringing. This article argues that the former interpretation neglects the requirement that a copy be fixed for more than a transitory duration, and that the latter interpretation is more consistent with the text and purpose of the Copyright Act. It argues that courts should use the latter interpretation in future copyright infringement cases involving machine learning. In particular, courts should apply the Second Circuit’s decision in Cartoon Network v. CSC Holdings. Using such an approach, courts may find in many cases that machine learning does not infringe copyright.

QJ 51.1 - Lasting Impact: Why You Should Care About Court of Customs and Patent Appeal Cases

Hira Javed, Amanda Murphy, Ph.D., Caitlin O’Connell, Shannon Patrick, Angeline Premraj, Emma Ng, Brady Nash, Stacy Lewis, and Tom Irving

 

Powerful case law sits within easy reach of practitioners, but most do not use and many do not even know about it. The Court of Customs and Patent Appeals (CCPA), which always sat en banc and was the predecessor to today’s Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC), developed a rich body of jurisprudence relating to U.S. patent law. In this article we will analyze CCPA precedent by points of law and hope that our efforts will inspire the patent bar to apply these CCPA cases.

QJ49-4-Chen QJ 51.1 - Artificial Music: Authorship and Copyrightability of Artificial Intelligence Musical Works

David Hörger

 

Artificial Intelligence has started to produce creative musical works with astonishing speed and complexity. This note discusses whether these AI compositions meet the Copyright Act’s authorship requirements. Focusing on the “quantum of creativity” requirement the Supreme Court laid out in Feist Publications v. Rural Telephone Service Company, the note discusses ways creativity might be identified in musical and legal frameworks. This note suggests that copyright might be vested by identifying this creativity through a principle of “Relatable Expression” in musical AIs. Relatable Expression would allow a limited copyright held by a user capable of authorship as long as that user makes a copyrightable expression input into the AI algorithm, which is present in the output score, and then only to the extent that the user’s expression is essential or intertwined to the final work.

QJ 51.1 - Copyright for Fashion Designs: Slowing Fast Fashion's Harms on Small Designers, Labor, and the Environment

Kyra A. Josephson

 

The fashion industry is a unique creative industry in that it thrives despite rampant copying. Many scholars have argued against enacting legislation to protect fashion designs, believing that the lack of copyright protection fuels innovation and creativity. This may be true when considering the copying of fashion designs in its typical context: large, established corporations copying designs from luxury brands to sell at much lower prices. However, the same is not true when fast fashion companies copy designs from small, independent designers who are often the individuals developing the most creative designs. The fast fashion industry has become increasingly harmful for small, independent designers in recent years as social media has increased visibility of their designs. In addition to disproportionately harming smaller independent designers, the fast fashion industry continues to exploit cheap labor and harm the environment—making the need for a legal solution especially ripe today. This note recommends reconsidering legislation to provide copyright protection to certain fashion designs to address the harms facing independent designers, the individuals making clothes, and the environment.

QJ 51.1 - The Biometric Bitcoin: Blockchain Solutions to Consumer Privacy

Travis Yuille

 

“You are what you eat” still reigns true, but in the twenty-first century, you are the media you consume. This note highlights how consumers unwittingly trade highly personal information, predictive of their inner most thoughts and desires in exchange for modern convenience— a practice that is largely unregulated on the federal level. Currently, intellectual property laws are ill-equipped to enforce ownership rights for consumers in their personal data. But blockchain technology has introduced unique property-like interests in digital assets such as traceability, chain of title, and single-party ownership. Blockchain technology can be leveraged to administer a new form of intellectual property ownership for consumer biometric data. This note proposes the Consumer Blockchain Privacy Act, a blockchain-centered solution to biometric data ownership.

Knobbe Martens

Upcoming Events

  • AIPLA CLE Webinar: Mastering Foreign Filing Licenses: Strategies for Obtaining Retroactive Foreign Filing Licenses from the USPTO and Strategies for Global Patent FFL Compliance

    August 7, 2025 12:30 PM to 2:00 PM   |   Up to 90 Mins CLE Eligible

    Expand your expertise in USPTO processes for obtaining retroactive foreign filing licenses in the U.S. Also, learn about strategies to navigate the complex international laws surrounding foreign filing licenses and how to avoid needing a retroactive license. Discover how to effectively manage foreign filing licenses and learn from real-world examples of approaches that ensure compliance across jurisdictions. We will also walk through approaches to obtaining retroactive foreign filing licenses and navigating the numerous requirements of the USPTO.
  • 2025 AM IP Practice in Japan Pre-Meeting

    October 28 to 29, 2025

    The Pre-Meeting is open to all and is a great event for networking with colleagues from Japan and other countries. Presentations will be provided by the speakers from AIPLA, the Japan Patent Attorney Association (JPAA), and possibly from the International Association for the Protection of the Intellectual Property in Japan (AIPPI-J), Japan Trademark Association (JTA) and Japan Patent Office (JPO) on a range of topics
  • 2025 Design Rights Summit

    October 29, 2025 9:00 AM to 5:00 PM   |   CLE calculations pending

    Design Rights Summit: Its more than just design patents . Save-The-Date! Registration opens soon. Get insights from leading practitioners from around the world on the latest developments in copyright, trade dress and design patents. In this online age, protecting the appearance of products has never been more important. This program is presented as a pre-meeting to the 2025 AIPLA Annual Meeting. Discounted pricing will be available for those also attending the Annual.
  • AIPLA 2025 Annual Meeting

    October 30 to November 1, 2025

    Join us as we bring IP professionals together to learn and connect. More information coming soon! The 2025 Annual meeting will take place at the Westin Washington, DC, Downtown. Leadership Meetings on Wednesday, October 29. Programming scheduled October 30 - November 1.
  • 2026 Spring Meeting - San Francisco, CA

    May 13 to 15, 2026

    We’re excited to welcome you to the 2026 AIPLA Spring Meeting, where innovation, technology, and intellectual property come together to shape the future. San Francisco is ready for your ideas, energy, and passion for IP!