AIPLA CLE Webinar: Greenwashing Compliance
April 8, 2026 12:30 PM to 2:00 PM
Environmental marketing claims are under greater legal scrutiny than ever before, creating significant risks for companies and the IP attorneys who advise them. This CLE program, Greenwashing Under Scrutiny: Navigating Legal Risks in Environmental Claims, examines the FTC’s Green Guides, Lanham Act false advertising claims, state consumer protection laws, and emerging global regulations affecting environmental claims. We will review recent U.S. court decisions, attendees will learn how to identify problematic claims, assess litigation risk, and develop strategies to protect their clients. This program is a must-attend for IP practitioners advising clients in industries where sustainability and environmental marketing play a key role.
Presented by:
Jordyn Milewski, Frankfurt Kurnit Klein + Selz PC
Felicia J. Boyd, Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP
This event is free to AIPLA members who are not requesting CLE. Standard webinar pricing applies to those requesting CLE. CLE is included for our All-Access Pass holders and eligible Corporate Subscribers.
Pricing below only applies to those requesting CLE
| Registration Type | AIPLA Member Rate | Non-Member Rate |
| Individual Registration | $99 | $249 |
| 2-5 Attendees per Site | $249 | $399 |
| 6-10 Attendees per Site | $449 | $599 |
| 11-15 Attendees per Site | $649 | $799 |
| 16-20 Attendees per Site | $749 | $899 |
| 21+ Attendees per Site | $849 | $999 |
Special rate for AIPLA Solo Practitioner Members: $65
Special rate for AIPLA Student Members: $10
In response to Covid-19, AIPLA has put in-place a new process for Multiple Attendee Site registrations that allows each site registrant to participate in the webinar independently. Contact cle@aipla.org at least 3 business days prior to the live webinar for site registrations. Space is limited; seats cannot be guaranteed even with the purchase of a site registration.
Paid Registration Includes:
- CLE certification/processing for applicable states. Reference CLE Information below for complete details.
- Webinar materials, including complete CLE processing information.
Cancellation Policy:
To get full refund, registrant must request refund five (5) days prior to live event. If less than five (5) days, registrant is transferred to product.
System requirements:
Webinar access is compatible with any Windows 7 or later computer, Android OS devices, or Apple/iOS devices.
Accessibility for hearing impaired:
AIPLA’s webinars are available and accessible to individuals who are hearing impaired. If anyone at your location would like to know more about accommodations, please contact cle@aipla.org. We ask that you let us know at least 7 business days prior to the webinar, to ensure that we can identify and deploy the solution that best fits the registrants needs.
CLE INFORMATION
CLE is approved with the following states:
- Alaska
- California
- Missouri
- New Jersey (Under New Jersey's Reciprocity Rule)
- New York (Under New York's Approved Jurisdiction Policy)
- Pennsylvania
- Texas
- Vermont
AIPLA will automatically apply for CLE accreditation in the following states:
- Illinois
- Minnesota
- Ohio
- Tennessee
- Virginia
- Washington
For information on CLE accreditation in all other states, please contact our CLE Department at cle@aipla.org. CLE credit may be available, but will require additional time for approval and CLE processing.
CLE Restrictions:
ATTENTION attorneys in Louisiana, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Utah
These states mandate attorneys can only view a webinar independently at their own computer to receive CLE credit. Multiple attendees prohibited.
ATTENTION attorneys in Alabama and Rhode Island
AIPLA does not submit courses for approval in Alabama or Rhode Island. Attendees needing credit in these states may select the free, no CLE option to watch the webinar and use course materials and their certificate of attendance to request course approval directly from the State Bars.
ATTENTION attorneys in Arizona
Arizona does not certify courses or providers. Arizona lawyers are required to independently review AZ's regulations and make their own determination that it qualifies for credit towards their MCLE requirements. MCLE Regulation 104(A) identifies the standards to apply. AIPLA will email an attendance affidavit to registrants requesting AZ CLE credit after the webinar.
ATTENTION attorneys in New Hampshire
New Hampshire attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance according to NH Supreme Court Rule 53. The New Hampshire Minimum Continuing Legal Education (NHMCLE) Board does not approve or accredit CLE activities for the NH Minimum CLE requirement.
Disclaimer: AIPLA is a nonprofit national bar association. The sole purpose of this CLE program is to provide educational and informational content. AIPLA does not provide legal services or advice. The opinions, views and other statements expressed by contributors to this CLE program are solely those of the contributors. These opinions, views and statements of the contributors do not necessarily represent those of AIPLA and should not be construed as such.
Add to:
News
-
AIPLA Submits Comments on the World Intellectual Property Organization Riyadh Design Law Treaty
June 24, 2026
Alexandria, VA. June 11, 2026 – The American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) submitted comments on the World Intellectual Property Organization Riyadh Design Law Treaty. -
AIPLA Files Amicus Brief in Arbutus Biopharma Corp. v. Moderna, Inc.
June 22, 2026
Arlington, VA. June 5, 2026 – The American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) filed an amicus brief in Arbutus Biopharma Corp. v. Modernatx, Inc. -
Supreme Court Issues Unanimous Decision in Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. v. Amarin Pharma, Inc.
June 4, 2026
On June 4, 2026, the Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. v. Amarin Pharma, Inc. While the Court reaffirmed existing law on pleading standards, it reversed the Federal Circuit’s decision that had focused on how relevant statements could be understood by medical providers as instructions to infringe. The amicus brief filed by AIPLA on March 27, 2026, advocated for affirmance and cautioned the Court not to change the patent infringement pleading standard or adopt any categorical exemption from inducement for a particular industry. -
AIPLA Views on H.R. 3269, the “ETHIC Act,” and H.R. 6485, the “Skinny Labels, Big Savings Act”
June 3, 2026
Arlington, VA. June 3, 2026 – The American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) submitted a letter to the House Judiciary Committee’s Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property, Artificial Intelligence, and the Internet outlining its views on H.R. 3269, the “ETHIC Act,” and H.R. 6485, the “Skinny Labels, Big Savings Act.” -
AIPLA Submits Comments to the USPTO on 2026 Supplemental GUI Guidance
May 15, 2026
Arlington, VA. May 12, 2026 – The American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) submitted comments to the USPTO on its Supplemental Guidance for Examination of Design Patent Applications Related to Computer-Generated Interfaces and Icons, issued on March 13, 2026.
