Continuing Legal Education (CLE)

AIPLA Career & Practice Management Discussion Series - Protecting Trade Secrets in an Anti-Noncompete Era

March 2, 2021 12:30 PM to 2:00 PM

Registration

Fee: Member-benefit exclusive!

Register Now

Member-benefit exclusive!  A presentation from the Career & Practice Management Discussion Series.. No CLE credit available. 

Noncompetition agreements have historically offered powerful protection against misappropriation of trade secrets. While a departing employee may have legal and contractual obligations to refrain from disclosing trade secrets to a subsequent competing employer, an enforceable noncompete means that the employer need not blindly trust that its former employee will remain faithful to these obligations. Removing the employee from the competitor effectively removes the threat. But noncompetes have fallen out of favor with many judges, state legislators, and even our new President, all of whom decry these agreements as being unfair to workers and improperly restrictive of their mobility in the labor market. Many states have enacted statutes limiting or prohibiting the enforcement of noncompetes, and the Biden Administration has forewarned of his intention to abolish them. In light of these challenges, noncompetes have become a less reliable tool, and businesses need to find alternative means to protect and secure their trade secrets. In this seminar, Tom McNulty, an intellectual property attorney at Lando & Anastasi, and Max Perlman an employment and trade secret litigator at Hirsch Roberts Weinstein LLP, will address the challenges and potential solutions through a discussion of the following topics:

  • A Powerful Tool: Protecting Trade Secrets with Noncompetes
    • Using noncompetes to protect trade secrets
    • Unique protection offered by noncompetes
  • Challenges to the Enforceability (and Existence, Even) of Noncompetes
    • Recent court decisions
    • State legislative efforts
    • President Biden’s warnings
  • Optimizing the Prospects for Enforcement of Noncompetes
    • Reasonableness in scope and target
    • Reasonableness in enforcement efforts
    • Statutory compliance / adherence to presumptions
  • Plan B: Protecting Trade Secrets in the Absence of Noncompetes
    • Other restrictive covenants
    • DTSA / UTSA / Inevitable disclosure
    • Practical / technological solutions
    • Special considerations for protecting trade secrets in a remote working environment
 
Presented by: Tom McNulty of Lando & Anastasi and Max Perlman of Hirsch Roberts Weinstein LLP.


System requirements: 

Webinar access is compatible with any Windows 7 or later computer, Android OS devices, or Apple/iOS devices.  Check system compatibility here.

Accessibility for hearing impaired:

AIPLA’s webinars are available and accessible to individuals who are hearing impaired. If anyone at your location would like to know more about accommodations, please contact cle@aipla.org. We ask that you let us know at least 7 business days out from the webinar, to ensure that we can identify and deploy the solution that best fits our registrants needs.


 Disclaimer:  AIPLA is a nonprofit national bar association.  The sole purpose of this CLE program is to provide educational and informational content.  AIPLA does not provide legal services or advice.  The opinions, views and other statements expressed by contributors to this CLE program are solely those of the contributors.  These opinions, views and statements of the contributors do not necessarily represent those of AIPLA and should not be construed as such.




 

Add to:

 

 

News

  • AIPLA Comments to Copyright Office on Group Registration of Two-Dimensional Artwork

    April 2, 2024

    Arlington, VA. April 1, 2024 - The American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) submitted comments in response to the U.S. Copyright Office's Notice of Proposed Rulemaking related to group registration of two-dimensional artwork.
  • AIPLA Files Amicus Brief with the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Google LLC v. Sonos, Inc.

    March 21, 2024

    Arlington, VA. February 29, 2024 - The American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) filed an amicus brief in support of neither party with the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Google LLC v. Sonos, Inc., a case on appeal from the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The district court held that the post-GATT patents-in-suit are unenforceable under the doctrine of prosecution laches and found unreasonable and inexcusable delay where 13 years had elapsed between the provisional patent application and presenting the claims at issue.
  • AIPLA Comments to Copyright Office on Group Registration of Updates to a News Website

    February 22, 2024

    Arlington, VA. February 20, 2024 - The American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) submitted comments in response to the U.S. Copyright Office's Notice of Proposed Rulemaking related to group registration of updates to a news website.
  • Research and Innovation 1320x480 AIPLA Comments to HHS on WHO Pandemic Treaty

    February 8, 2024

    Arlington, VA. January 31, 2024 - The American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) submitted comments in response to the RFC on Implications of Access and Benefit Sharing (ABS) Commitments/Regimes and Other Proposed Commitments in the World Health Organization (WHO) Pandemic Agreement.
  • Washington DC web AIPLA Comments to NIST on March-In Rights Guidance

    February 7, 2024

    Arlington, VA. February 5, 2024 - The American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) submitted comments to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) in response to the Request for Information Regarding the Draft Interagency Guidance Framework for Considering the Exercise of March-In Rights.