Continuing Legal Education (CLE)

AIPLA Career & Practice Management Discussion Series - Protecting Trade Secrets in an Anti-Noncompete Era

March 2, 2021 12:30 PM to 2:00 PM

Registration

Fee: Member-benefit exclusive!

Register Now

Member-benefit exclusive!  A presentation from the Career & Practice Management Discussion Series.. No CLE credit available. 

Noncompetition agreements have historically offered powerful protection against misappropriation of trade secrets. While a departing employee may have legal and contractual obligations to refrain from disclosing trade secrets to a subsequent competing employer, an enforceable noncompete means that the employer need not blindly trust that its former employee will remain faithful to these obligations. Removing the employee from the competitor effectively removes the threat. But noncompetes have fallen out of favor with many judges, state legislators, and even our new President, all of whom decry these agreements as being unfair to workers and improperly restrictive of their mobility in the labor market. Many states have enacted statutes limiting or prohibiting the enforcement of noncompetes, and the Biden Administration has forewarned of his intention to abolish them. In light of these challenges, noncompetes have become a less reliable tool, and businesses need to find alternative means to protect and secure their trade secrets. In this seminar, Tom McNulty, an intellectual property attorney at Lando & Anastasi, and Max Perlman an employment and trade secret litigator at Hirsch Roberts Weinstein LLP, will address the challenges and potential solutions through a discussion of the following topics:

  • A Powerful Tool: Protecting Trade Secrets with Noncompetes
    • Using noncompetes to protect trade secrets
    • Unique protection offered by noncompetes
  • Challenges to the Enforceability (and Existence, Even) of Noncompetes
    • Recent court decisions
    • State legislative efforts
    • President Biden’s warnings
  • Optimizing the Prospects for Enforcement of Noncompetes
    • Reasonableness in scope and target
    • Reasonableness in enforcement efforts
    • Statutory compliance / adherence to presumptions
  • Plan B: Protecting Trade Secrets in the Absence of Noncompetes
    • Other restrictive covenants
    • DTSA / UTSA / Inevitable disclosure
    • Practical / technological solutions
    • Special considerations for protecting trade secrets in a remote working environment
 
Presented by: Tom McNulty of Lando & Anastasi and Max Perlman of Hirsch Roberts Weinstein LLP.


System requirements: 

Webinar access is compatible with any Windows 7 or later computer, Android OS devices, or Apple/iOS devices.  Check system compatibility here.

Accessibility for hearing impaired:

AIPLA’s webinars are available and accessible to individuals who are hearing impaired. If anyone at your location would like to know more about accommodations, please contact cle@aipla.org. We ask that you let us know at least 7 business days out from the webinar, to ensure that we can identify and deploy the solution that best fits our registrants needs.


 Disclaimer:  AIPLA is a nonprofit national bar association.  The sole purpose of this CLE program is to provide educational and informational content.  AIPLA does not provide legal services or advice.  The opinions, views and other statements expressed by contributors to this CLE program are solely those of the contributors.  These opinions, views and statements of the contributors do not necessarily represent those of AIPLA and should not be construed as such.




 

Add to:

 

 

News

  • AIPLA Files Supreme Court Amicus Brief in RiseandShine v. PepsiCo

    September 18, 2026

    Alexandria, VA. September 15, 2026 – The American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) filed an amicus brief in RiseandShine Corp. v. PepsiCo, Inc., a case before the Supreme Court of the United States.
  • USPTOHouseLetter-12-1-21-logo AIPLA Joins IPO and INTA in Urging Extension of USPTO Fee-Setting Authority

    September 2, 2026

    Alexandria, VA. September 1, 2026 – The American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) joined the Intellectual Property Owners Association (IPO) and the International Trademark Association (INTA) in a letter to Congress supporting the extension of the USPTO’s fee-setting authority, which is set to expire on September 16, 2026. The organizations emphasized the importance of this authority in enabling the USPTO to fund operations, modernize its systems, and maintain efficient patent and trademark examination processes.
  • USPTO AIPLA Comments on Ex Parte Reexamination Requirements

    August 27, 2026

    Alexandria, VA. August 21, 2026 – The American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) submitted comments in response to the USPTO’s Notice of Proposed Rulemaking proposing to require identification of all real parties-in-interest (RPIs) in third-party ex parte reexamination requests.
  • AIPLA Comments to the Copyright Office on Alternative Fee Structures for Registration

    July 6, 2026

    Alexandria, VA. June 24, 2026 – The American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) submitted comments on the U.S. Copyright Office's Notice of Inquiry regarding alternative copyright registration fee structures.
  • TermDisc-Comments-March21-logo AIPLA Comments to the Copyright Office on Group Registration of Updates to a News Website

    July 6, 2026

    Alexandria, VA. June 29, 2026 – The American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) submitted comments supporting the U.S. Copyright Office's proposed expansion of eligibility for group registration of updates to news websites by removing restrictions that exclude subject-specific publications.