Continuing Legal Education (CLE)
AIPLA CLE Webinar: Early Neutral Evaluation of Trademark/Trade Dress Disputes - A "Virtual" and Efficient Alternative in the Covid-19 Era
August 13, 2020 12:30 PM to 1:30 PM (Eastern Daylight Time)
1.0 CLE Credits
This webinar will explain why ”V-ENE” (Virtual Early Neutral Evaluation) is a good fit for COVID-19 era disputes in general, why it's a good fit in particular for many Trademark/Trade Dress disputes, how such V-ENE might actually work advantageously for such disputes, and how it can be implemented efficiently in practice.
The use of various forms of Alternate Dispute Resolution (ADR) such as Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE), Mediation, and Arbitration, in the IP arena—especially regarding Trademark/Trade Dress disputes—is established but underutilized. In typical times, traditional litigation—with all of its pros and cons—is the norm. In this highly atypical COVID-19 era, however, “business as usual” and ordinary litigation practices may be deemed less than optimal.
Right now, and for some time to come, people will be reluctant to travel, to meet other people in person, or even to go into their own offices. And courts and administrative agencies—including, of course, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office—have been stymied and slowed down significantly. Companies that usually engage in traditional litigation are functioning with reduced staffing, protecting their executives and employees from contagion, while watching their profit/loss indicators cautiously. Accordingly, approaches that are less time/money/stress-intensive may be appealing. This is especially so for ENE, which is the most immediately available and usually the least intrusive and expensive of ADR modes. And since ENE can be effectively conducted in “virtual” format, it may be the best approach.
Ken Germain, longtime Practitioner/Professor focusing on Trademark/Trade Dress issues, will discuss explain.
Presented by: Kenneth Germain of Wood Herron & Evans LLPAdd to:
Federal Circuit Affirms Limits on How Government Uses PACER Fees
August 7, 2020The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on August 6, 2020, affirmed that the government can use PACER revenues for operating the electronic court record system, but not for unrelated court technology projects.
Bee Farm Didn’t Infringe Copyright Related to Honey Harvest Tool
August 6, 2020The US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on August 4, 2020, held that a bee farm didn’t infringe a copyright related to a honey harvesting aid when it replaced the tool with its own version.
Teva Beats Patent Infringement Suit Over Generic Thyroid Drug
August 5, 2020Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc., an American Israeli pharmaceutical company that specializes in generic drugs, beat back IBSA Institut Biochimique’s patent infringement suit concerning the thyroid drug Tirosint.
AIPLA Q&A with Senator Chris Coons
August 4, 2020In this edition of AIPLA Direct Live, AIPLA President Barbara A. Fiacco asks the Honorable Chris Coons, United States Senator from Delaware, about the state of the intellectual property landscape.
FanDuel Loses Bid to Invalidate Part of Remote Gambling Patent
August 3, 2020The Federal Circuit on July 29, 2020, held that FanDuel, the US bookmaker and daily fantasy sports provider, failed to show that part of a competitor’s remote gambling patent was invalid as obvious.