Continuing Legal Education (CLE)
AIPLA CLE Webinar: Early Neutral Evaluation of Trademark/Trade Dress Disputes - A "Virtual" and Efficient Alternative in the Covid-19 Era
August 13, 2020 12:30 PM to 1:30 PM
This webinar will explain why ”V-ENE” (Virtual Early Neutral Evaluation) is a good fit for COVID-19 era disputes in general, why it's a good fit in particular for many Trademark/Trade Dress disputes, how such V-ENE might actually work advantageously for such disputes, and how it can be implemented efficiently in practice.
The use of various forms of Alternate Dispute Resolution (ADR) such as Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE), Mediation, and Arbitration, in the IP arena—especially regarding Trademark/Trade Dress disputes—is established but underutilized. In typical times, traditional litigation—with all of its pros and cons—is the norm. In this highly atypical COVID-19 era, however, “business as usual” and ordinary litigation practices may be deemed less than optimal.
Right now, and for some time to come, people will be reluctant to travel, to meet other people in person, or even to go into their own offices. And courts and administrative agencies—including, of course, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office—have been stymied and slowed down significantly. Companies that usually engage in traditional litigation are functioning with reduced staffing, protecting their executives and employees from contagion, while watching their profit/loss indicators cautiously. Accordingly, approaches that are less time/money/stress-intensive may be appealing. This is especially so for ENE, which is the most immediately available and usually the least intrusive and expensive of ADR modes. And since ENE can be effectively conducted in “virtual” format, it may be the best approach.
Ken Germain, longtime Practitioner/Professor focusing on Trademark/Trade Dress issues, will discuss explain.
Presented by: Kenneth Germain of Wood Herron & Evans LLP
Add to:
News
-
AIPLA Submits Comments to the USPTO on 2026 Supplemental GUI Guidance
May 15, 2026
Arlington, VA. May 12, 2026 – The American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) submitted comments to the USPTO on its Supplemental Guidance for Examination of Design Patent Applications Related to Computer-Generated Interfaces and Icons, issued on March 13, 2026. -
AIPLA Comments on the Copyright Office's Proposed Fee Schedule Adjustment
May 8, 2026
Arlington, VA. May 1, 2026 – The American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) submitted comments in response to the U.S. Copyright Office’s Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on adjustments to its fee schedule. -
AIPLA Submits Comments on the Enlarged Board of Appeal’s 11 Preliminary Opinion in G 1/25
May 1, 2026
Arlington, VA. April 17, 2026 – The American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) submitted comments on the Enlarged Board of Appeal’s 11 March 2026 preliminary opinion in G 1/25, addressing whether patent descriptions must be adapted following claim amendments. -
AIPLA Files Amicus Brief in Range of Motion Products, LLC v. Armaid Company Inc.
April 20, 2026
Arlington, VA — April 17, 2026 — The American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) filed an amicus curiae brief with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Range of Motion Products, LLC v. Armaid Company Inc., No. 23-2427, supporting rehearing and rehearing en banc. AIPLA urges the Court to restore clarity to design patent law by (1) reaffirming that Gorham v. White (1871) provides the sole governing test for infringement and forecloses any separate “plainly dissimilar” threshold, and (2) confirming that claim construction may not be used to exclude any visual portions of the overall claimed design. -
AIPLA Comments on CNIPA Draft Measures for Prioritized Patent Examination
April 1, 2026
Arlington, VA. March 30, 2026 – The American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) submitted comments to the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) regarding the Draft Measures for the Administration of Prioritized Examination of Patents.
