Continuing Legal Education (CLE)
AIPLA CLE Webinar: Early Neutral Evaluation of Trademark/Trade Dress Disputes - A "Virtual" and Efficient Alternative in the Covid-19 Era
August 13, 2020 12:30 PM to 1:30 PM
This webinar will explain why ”V-ENE” (Virtual Early Neutral Evaluation) is a good fit for COVID-19 era disputes in general, why it's a good fit in particular for many Trademark/Trade Dress disputes, how such V-ENE might actually work advantageously for such disputes, and how it can be implemented efficiently in practice.
The use of various forms of Alternate Dispute Resolution (ADR) such as Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE), Mediation, and Arbitration, in the IP arena—especially regarding Trademark/Trade Dress disputes—is established but underutilized. In typical times, traditional litigation—with all of its pros and cons—is the norm. In this highly atypical COVID-19 era, however, “business as usual” and ordinary litigation practices may be deemed less than optimal.
Right now, and for some time to come, people will be reluctant to travel, to meet other people in person, or even to go into their own offices. And courts and administrative agencies—including, of course, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office—have been stymied and slowed down significantly. Companies that usually engage in traditional litigation are functioning with reduced staffing, protecting their executives and employees from contagion, while watching their profit/loss indicators cautiously. Accordingly, approaches that are less time/money/stress-intensive may be appealing. This is especially so for ENE, which is the most immediately available and usually the least intrusive and expensive of ADR modes. And since ENE can be effectively conducted in “virtual” format, it may be the best approach.
Ken Germain, longtime Practitioner/Professor focusing on Trademark/Trade Dress issues, will discuss explain.
Presented by: Kenneth Germain of Wood Herron & Evans LLP
Add to:
News
-
AIPLA Comments on CNIPA Draft Measures for Prioritized Patent Examination
April 1, 2026
Arlington, VA. March 30, 2026 – The American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) submitted comments to the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) regarding the Draft Measures for the Administration of Prioritized Examination of Patents. -
AIPLA Files Amicus Brief in Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. v. Amarin Pharma, Inc
March 31, 2026
Arlington, VA. March 27, 2026 – The American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) filed an amicus curiae brief with the Supreme Court in Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. v. Amarin Pharma, Inc., No. 24-889. AIPLA urges the Court to affirm the Federal Circuit’s application of the established Iqbal/Twombly pleading standard and inducement law in reviewing Hikma’s motion to dismiss Amarin’s claim that Hikma’s conduct, in combination with its “skinny label,” induced infringement of Amarin’s patented treatment methods. -
Supreme Court Issues Unanimous Decision in Cox Communications, Inc. v. Sony Music Entertainment
March 25, 2026
On March 25, 2026, the Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in Cox Communications, Inc. v. Sony Music Entertainment. The majority opinion limits contributory liability to situations where a party intended that its service be used for infringement, either by affirmatively inducing infringement or by selling a service tailored to infringement. A concurring opinion by Justice Sotomayor argues that the material contribution test should be retained, and that other forms of secondary liability can be found, which is consistent with the position asserted by AIPLA in its amicus brief filed on September 5, 2025. To read the opinion of the Court, please click here. -
AIPLA Comments on the Draft Trademark Law of the People’s Republic of China
March 23, 2026
Arlington, VA. February 9, 2026 – The American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) submitted comments to the Legislative Affairs Commission of the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress regarding the latest Draft Trademark Law of the People’s Republic of China. AIPLA recognized the NPC’s efforts to streamline trademark procedures, strengthen protection, and address abusive and bad-faith filing practices. -
AIPLA Files Amicus Brief in USAA v. PNC Bank
March 3, 2026
Arlington, VA. March 2, 2026 – The American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) filed an amicus brief with the Supreme Court in USAA v. PNC Bank, N.A., No. 25-853, in support of USAA’s petition for certiorari, urging the Court to provide much-needed guidance to address the unpredictable and overly broad application of the judicial exceptions to patent-eligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101, particularly the “abstract idea” exception.
