Continuing Legal Education (CLE)

AIPLA Front & Center Webinar Series - Protecting Value: The Legal Strategies and Challenges of Protecting Big Data

April 7, 2020 12:30 PM to 1:30 PM

Registration

Fee: Member-benefit exclusive!

Register Now

Member-benefit exclusive!  A presentation from the Front & Center Discussion Series. No CLE credit available. 

 
Big data is the primary asset for many businesses. Using artificial intelligence (AI), data can drive new revenue streams, new customer insights, and new product enhancements. Given the massive value that AI can create, protecting the big data that is fed into AI models is critical for data-driven businesses. This session will provide attendees with the opportunity to learn about the various strategies for legal protection of data sets under U.S. law, including the benefits and challenges of different IP frameworks. Additionally, this session will compare domestic data protection laws with international data protection approaches. Participants will also gain a better understanding of how data is being used to drive American businesses and the strategic choices that such businesses are considering to protect their data. Finally, this session will include insight into the Open Data movement, in which open source software principles are applied to the collection and distribution of big data.

Presented by Sameer Vadera of Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP

System requirements: 

Webinar access is compatible with any Windows 7 or later computer, Android OS devices, or Apple/iOS devices.  Check system compatibility here.

Accessibility for hearing impaired:

AIPLA’s webinars are available and accessible to individuals who are hearing impaired. If anyone at your location would like to know more about accommodations, please contact cle@aipla.org. We ask that you let us know at least 7 business days out from the webinar, to ensure that we can identify and deploy the solution that best fits our registrants needs.


 Disclaimer:  AIPLA is a nonprofit national bar association.  The sole purpose of this CLE program is to provide educational and informational content.  AIPLA does not provide legal services or advice.  The opinions, views and other statements expressed by contributors to this CLE program are solely those of the contributors.  These opinions, views and statements of the contributors do not necessarily represent those of AIPLA and should not be construed as such.




 

Add to:

 

 

News

  • TermDisc-Comments-March21-logo AIPLA Submits Comments to the USPTO on 2026 Supplemental GUI Guidance

    May 15, 2026

    Arlington, VA. May 12, 2026 – The American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) submitted comments to the USPTO on its Supplemental Guidance for Examination of Design Patent Applications Related to Computer-Generated Interfaces and Icons, issued on March 13, 2026.
  • AIPLA Comments on the Copyright Office's Proposed Fee Schedule Adjustment

    May 8, 2026

    Arlington, VA. May 1, 2026 – The American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) submitted comments in response to the U.S. Copyright Office’s Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on adjustments to its fee schedule.
  • TermDisc-Comments-March21-logo AIPLA Submits Comments on the Enlarged Board of Appeal’s 11 Preliminary Opinion in G 1/25

    May 1, 2026

    Arlington, VA. April 17, 2026 – The American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) submitted comments on the Enlarged Board of Appeal’s 11 March 2026 preliminary opinion in G 1/25, addressing whether patent descriptions must be adapted following claim amendments.
  • Supreme Court AIPLA Files Amicus Brief in Range of Motion Products, LLC v. Armaid Company Inc.

    April 20, 2026

    Arlington, VA — April 17, 2026 — The American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) filed an amicus curiae brief with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Range of Motion Products, LLC v. Armaid Company Inc., No. 23-2427, supporting rehearing and rehearing en banc. AIPLA urges the Court to restore clarity to design patent law by (1) reaffirming that Gorham v. White (1871) provides the sole governing test for infringement and forecloses any separate “plainly dissimilar” threshold, and (2) confirming that claim construction may not be used to exclude any visual portions of the overall claimed design.
  • TermDisc-Comments-March21-logo AIPLA Comments on CNIPA Draft Measures for Prioritized Patent Examination

    April 1, 2026

    Arlington, VA. March 30, 2026 – The American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) submitted comments to the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) regarding the Draft Measures for the Administration of Prioritized Examination of Patents.