Innovate Magazine

INNOVATE is the online magazine by and for AIPLA members from IP law students all the way through retired practitioners. Designed as an online publication, INNOVATE features magazine-like articles of 500-1,500 words in length on a wide variety of topics in IP law.

Publishing an article to INNOVATE is a great way for AIPLA members to build their brand by increasing recognition among peers and setting themselves apart as thought leaders in the IP industry.

Any current AIPLA member in good standing may submit an article for consideration in INNOVATE throughout the year. IP law students are especially encouraged to submit articles for publication.

Articles submitted to are reviewed by an ad-hoc sub-committee of volunteers from AIPLA's Special Committee on Publications, the Fellows Committee, and other AIPLA peers. The review process ensures submitted articles follow the Guidelines for Article Submission. Approved articles are published quarterly.

Don’t miss your chance to be published with AIPLA’s INNOVATE! Email your article submission to to be considered for the next edition.


The submission window for Volume 8 is now open! Submit your article to by June 11, 2020 to be considered for Volume 8. 




Incorporating Intellectual Property Rights In SaaS Agreements

By: Heather Bowen

Businesses need a number of different commercial contracts to operate effectively. Savvy business leaders often seek to move forward and drive success by using information technology software provided under Software as a Service (SaaS) agreements. SaaS software is licensed by providers to customers on a subscription basis. SaaS providers maintain and host the software themselves (or through a third party vendor) and grant the customer access to the software via the internet.

SaaS agreements may be used to deliver both B2B (business-to-business) and B2C (business-to-consumer) SaaS products. These agreements are similar to other technology contracts, and they specify which features will be offered through the SaaS service. Typically included in such agreements are a variety of negotiable provisions, including, but not limited to, provisions addressing intellectual property rights, data privacy, limitations and caps on liability, disclaimers of warranties, choice of law, and choice of forum for resolving disputes. This article will particularly focus on the intellectual property landscape as it relates to SaaS agreements.

There are many types of intellectual property, including trademarks, copyrights, and patents. A trademark protects a word, phrase, symbol, slogan, and/or design that identifies and distinguishes the source of the goods and/or services of one owner from the goods and/or services of others. A copyright protects original artistic or literary works that are fixed in a tangible medium of expression, and includes, for example, books, photos, music, fine art, videos, films, recordings, and architecture – as well as software. A so-called “utility” patent protects new and useful processes, machines, and compositions, and a distinct type of patent protects ornamental designs.

A provider can minimize the risk associated with the license by specifically identifying the intellectual property rights being licensed and by clearly stating whether or not a customer is permitted to transfer any of the licensed rights. Indeed, a well-drafted SaaS agreement can simplify the negotiation process. 

Typically, such an agreement should contain a specific provision under which the customer acknowledges that the provider retains ownership of its intellectual property rights in the software, services, and systems to be provided.  That acknowledgement might take the form of a provision stating that the customer is being granted a license to use its intellectual property rights (e.g., . source code and logos), but that ownership of the software, documentation, and other intellectual property provided as part of the service remains exclusively in the provider. Further, the agreement should (1) specifically enumerate the limitations of the license and (2) state that any use of the intellectual property in a manner inconsistent with those limitations is unauthorized and constitutes a breach of the agreement.

Similarly, other provisions in SaaS agreements should state that the services are being provided only by way of the provider’s platform and that the customer is not permitted to host the software on its own platform. A provider can prevent ambiguity when drafting intellectual property provisions in SaaS agreements by including a clear statement that it is providing the service exclusively by granting the customer access to the provider’s own servers. The language of the agreement should avoid stating or implying that the provider will merely deliver software to the customer.

Incorporating well-crafted intellectual property provisions in SaaS agreements can be challenging. The most successful providers protect their companies by working with legal professionals who can tailor the SaaS agreements based on the company’s and customer’s specific needs and requirements.

Heather N. Bowen, Esq. focuses her practice on domestic and international trademark, copyright, licensing, technology, new media, data privacy, and business law matters. She has experience working with global companies in the media & entertainment and healthcare technology spaces. Heather has also helped 125 startup businesses in New York avoid pitfalls as they navigated from newly-commenced startups to established and successful entities. She continues to be a leader in the intellectual property and technology fields through publications in the legal press as well as her effective involvement in multiple bar association committees. When she is not practicing law, she can be found performing on one of her multiple instruments with the Brooklyn Symphony Orchestra (BSO) or Calvary Baptist Church.



Please login to see the content.
Register now

Patent Seekers