2018 Annual Meeting October 25 - 27, 2018 February 2019

Please sign in to view the articles. Once you've signed in please refresh the page to see the download link. 
From October 25-27, 2018, almost 2000 intellectual property practitioners took over the Marriott Wardman Park Hotel in Washington, DC to take advantage of CLE programs on cutting edge IP issues, informative committee meetings, and networking events. .
Kara Stoll The View from the Federal Circuit
Kara Stoll

 

Luncheon speaker Judge Kara Stoll of the Federal Circuit provided interesting insight into the Court’s views on Friday, October 26, 2018. The former Finnegan partner, who joined the Federal Circuit in 2015, spoke about her passage into public service. “In some ways it was an easy transition,” she told Lisa Jorgenson in an interview during the luncheon. “I didn’t have to worry about losing any cases and my clients always pay.”

But she says the sheer number of cases has been challenging. On the subject of rehearing petitions, Stoll raised a gripe. “For what it’s worth, I really think the court and the bar would be well served if there were more selective use of petitions for rehearing. Then the ones that are really deserving, exceptional issues of importance, would stand out a little more.”

Stoll observed that “occasionally, and maybe even often”, cases have a large time gap between when an appeal is filed and when oral argument is scheduled. “One thing I noticed was the delay wasn’t necessarily due to the court’s action,” she said. “We seemed to be keeping up, but in some cases counsel for both sides or just one side would identify months on end when they are not available for oral argument, and not necessarily explain why or give good cause.” She added: “It is something we are going to look into and something that is important to us because we want to keep up with our docket.”

Stoll discussed the number of issues that should be raised on appeal. The Federal Circuit has counseled for years that raising more than three issues can be difficult because of the limited amount of space in a brief and because weaker arguments can make stronger arguments appear weak. “We receive a number of appeals still where there are five or six issues raised, or the issues raised are questions of fact,” said Stoll. “For our review of PTAB appeals, the standard of review is substantial evidence. We see a lot of appeals where somebody is arguing that there isn’t substantial evidence to support a fact finding by the PTAB when in fact there is. So one thing that would behoove the bar would be to think about that substantial evidence standard and also think about legal issues.”

AIPLA Executive Director Jorgenson asked Stoll what distinguishes a good appellate lawyer from a great appellate lawyer. “It is really knowing the record well so that during oral argument you are faster with the record and the facts,” explained Stoll. At oral argument, the judges have already read the briefs and studied the relevant issues. They have to vote immediately after oral argument on the outcome of the case. “So a great attorney at oral argument really hears the question and answers with a yes or no and an explanation if necessary,” Stoll said. “They really know the record and the case law and are willing to make concessions, both in terms of what the facts are. But also if the attorney isn’t familiar with the particular case that you are asking about, it is better to admit you don’t know than to pretend you do.”

Stoll also gave some advice about writing briefs. She said that many briefs do not dig into the facts as much as necessary. One example of an error is saying a client should win because of a certain case and then just citing that case. A great brief would give the facts of the cited case and explain why the current case is just like it and why the court should rule the same way. “I am really surprised by the number of briefs that tackle the issues not at a level of depth that I need in order to be able to resolve the case,” said Stoll. “So I think that’s one thing that distinguishes a great brief from a good brief.”

Daniel Lee The USMCA’s “Loud and Clear Signal”
Daniel Lee Banner

 

The AIPLA Annual Meeting began in earnest on Thursday, October 25, 2018, with a very timely presentation during the Opening Plenary Session. Daniel Lee, Assistant US Trade Representative (Acting) for Innovation and Intellectual Property Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR), provided an overview of the United States-Mexico- Canada Agreement (USMCA), which was agreed in the very last few hours of September.

“I am happy to say that the IP chapter of the USMCA is the most robust IP chapter that USTR has ever negotiated,” said Lee. “It covers protection and enforcement across the IP spectrum, including trademarks, patents, trade secrets and copyright. The USMCA will raise the standard of IP protection and enforcement in Canada and Mexico. It also serves as a loud and clear signal to other countries as to what the United States expects for IP protection and enforcement.”

The USMCA includes many IP changes. “The real winners are US innovators and creators,” said Lee. The IP chapter includes provisions on biologics, trademarks, geographical indications, pharmaceutical patents, copyright and trade secrets.

AM18 Sponsors AM18 Sponsors
AM18 Sponsors
Knobbe Martens

Upcoming Events

  • AIPLA CLE Webinar: Introduction to the UPC

    February 9, 2023 12:30 PM to 2:00 PM   |   Up to 90 CLE Minutes

    June 1, 2023 is the current target date for the EU Unified Patent Court (UPC) to open and begin receiving cases. The UPC will have parallel territorial jurisdiction with national patent courts for all existing European Patents unless the patent owners “opt-out” of UPC jurisdiction. Learn all about revocation and infringement actions before the UPC as well as the respective course of these proceedings and the efficient management thereof. This webinar covers the intricacies of the different proceedings and provides strategies from a plaintiff’s and a defendant’s perspective. To put you in a position to select the jurisdiction that suits your needs best, similarities and differences between selected national proceedings and proceedings before the UPC will be pointed out.
  • CPM Webinar: Creating and Running an Ethical IP Law Firm Part 2 – Creating Firm Entity and Ownership; Determining Fees; Handling Client Money; Getting Paid; Record-Keeping Requirements; and Insurance

    February 14, 2023 12:30 PM to 2:00 PM   |   No CLE

    Welcome to Part 2 of the Guide to creating and running an ethical IP Law Firm. This 90-minute webinar has something for those interested in starting their own practice as well as for those who may want to restructure or clean up an existing practice. Our two expert speakers will address a range of topics including the different types of organizational structures for law firms; who is allowed to own or partner in a law firm (answering questions for Patent Agents too!); common operational agreements; billing and determining your firm’s fees; trust account, record-keeping and banking practices; getting paid; and insurance considerations for your IP law firm.
  • muhammad-faiz-zulkeflee-alw-CwGFmwQ-unsplash-400 AIPLA Virtual Water Cooler - February Meetup

    February 15, 2023 3:00 PM to 4:00 PM

    AIPLA’s Committee on the Profession is inviting you to join us around the virtual water cooler for a quick break. Drop in and catch up with colleagues old and new at this informal networking meetup. All are welcome.
  • AIPLA CLE Webinar: Unified Patent Court and Unitary Patents

    March 2, 2023 12:30 PM to 2:00 PM   |   Up to 90 CLE Minutes

    The Unitary Patent Court (UPC) will most likely enter into force in early 2023. That means that applicants and proprietors of European patent applications that have been granted European patents would need to determine their strategy for their European IP. If no action is taken, then the legal framework of the UPC will affect even the already granted EP patents. This webinar will discuss the effects of the UPC coming into force, as well as the options and decisions that the applicants and proprietors need to consider and implement.
  • AIPLA 2023 Spring Meeting

    May 10 to 12, 2023

    Join us for a great program at the Westin Seattle in Seattle, WA. Educational and Networking events are May 10-12. AIPLA Board and Leadership Meetings are May 9.