In re Silver, Sup. Ct. of Texas, No. 16-1682, 8/10/2017 August 9, 2017

File Downloads

All documents are in PDF format.

Communications between a patent agent and a client should enjoy the protections of an attorney-client privilege when those communications occur within the scope of a patent agent’s authority under the Patent Act, according to an AIPLA letter brief filed August 10, 2017, in the Supreme Court of Texas.

The letter brief cites Sperry v. State of Florida ex rel. Florida Bar, 373 U.S. 379 (1963), to show that a patent agent is a person authorized to practice federal law, satisfying the definition of a “lawyer” for privilege purposes under Texas rules of evidence. The letter brief also points to federal recognition of the patent agent privilege in In re Queen’s Univ. at Kingston, 820 F.3d 1287 (Fed. Cir. 2016).

Upcoming Events

  • AIPLA 2020 Trade Secret Law Summit - Weekly Webinar Series

    August 12 to September 2, 2020   |   Each Session is eligible for 90 minutes of CLE where applicable

    For the first time in this event's history, we are switching to an immersive virtual experience. The 2020 Trade Secret Law Summit will be presented in four easy-to-schedule-around sessions that you can join from your computer or mobile device. 
  • 2020 VIRTUAL PTAB Bench + Bar

    August 20, 2020 3:00 PM to 6:00 PM (Eastern Daylight Time)

    Engage Directly with PTAB Leaders and Judges. Gain an edge by learning about the latest at the PTAB. Register today!
  • AIPLA 2020 Virtual Annual Meeting

    October 22 to 30, 2020

    The AIPLA 2020 Virtual Annual Meeting is your platform to learn, network, and plot the next steps in your career as you find ways to unlock your potential.