Iancu v. Brunetti, U.S., No. 18-302, amicus brief filed 2/25/2019.
No. 18-302 In the Supreme Court of the United States ANDREI IANCU, UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR, PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Petitioner, v. ERIK BRUNETTI, Respondent. ______________ On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________ BRIEF OF THE AMERICAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY L
Letter to Representative Jeffries in Support of Legislation to Amend Section 2(b) of the Lanham Act
February 15, 2019 The Honorable Hakeem Jeffries Committee on the Judiciary United States House of Representatives 2433 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, DC 20515 Re: Support for Legislation to Amend Section 2(b) of the Lanham Act Dear Representative Jeffries: The American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) is pleased to write to you regarding
Letter in Support of CBP's Efforts to Modernize
February 2, 2019 Mr. Brandon Lord Office of Trade U.S. Customs & Border Protection 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Suite 950N Washington, DC 20229 Submitted via 21CCF@cbp.dhs.gov Re: Request for Public Comments: 21st Century Customs Framework 83 Fed. Reg. 245 (December 21, 2018) Dear Mr. Lord: The American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) is please
Proppant Express Investments, LLC v. Oren Technologies, LLC., PTAB, Case No. IPR2018-00914, amicus brief filed 12/28/2018.
Microsoft Word - HOUSTON-#697491-v6-AIPLA_Amicus_Brief_in_POP_Review_Proceeding.docx Paper No. __ Filed: December 28, 2018 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD PROPPANT EXPRESS INVESTMENTS, LLC, PROPPANT EXPRESS SOLUTIONS, LLC, Petitioner, v. OREN TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, Patent Owner. Case No. IPR2018-00914 U.S. Patent No. 9,511,929 B2 BRI
AIPLA Supplemental Comments on FTC Hearings on Competition and Consumer Protection in the 21st Century: Discussion of Innovation and IP Policy
December 21, 2018 VIA ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION THROUGH PORTAL: https://www.ftc.gov/i-would/file-comment/open-comment Office of Policy Planning Federal Trade Commission 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Suite CC-5610 (Annex C) Washington, DC 20580 RE: Supplemental Comments on Federal Trade Commission Hearings on Competition and Consumer Protection in the 21st Century: Discussion of I
AIPLA Comments to United States Patent and Trademark Office on Motion to Amend Practice and Procedures in Trial Proceedings under the America Invents Act before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board
December 20, 2018 Acting Deputy Chief Administrative Patent Judge Jacqueline Wright Bonilla and Vice Chief Administrative Patent Judge Michael Tierney Mail Stop Patent Board Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, VA 22313-1450 Via email: TrialRFC2018Amendments@uspto.gov Re: Request for Comments on Motion to Amend Practice and
Mission Product Holdings, Inc. v. Tempnology, LLC, U.S., No. 17-1657, filed 12/17/2018.
No. 17-1657 In the Supreme Court of the United States MISSION PRODUCT HOLDINGS, INC., Petitioner, v. TEMPNOLOGY, LLC, N/K/A OLD COLD LLC, Respondent. ______________ On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit ______________ BRIEF OF THE AMERICAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW ASSOCIATION AS AMICUS CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF NEITHER PA
Return Mail, Inc. v. United States Postal Service, U.S., No. 17-1594, amicus brief supporting a petition for certiorari, filed 12/17/2018.
No. 17-1594 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States ____________________ RETURN MAIL, INC., Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and UNITED STATES, Respondents. ____________________ On Writ Of Certiorari To The United States Court of Appeals For The Federal Circuit ____________________ BRIEF FOR THE AMERICAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW ASSOCIATION AS AMICUS CURIAE
Rimini Street, Inc. v. Oracle USA, Inc., U.S., No. 17-1625, amicus brief on the merits supporting neither party, filed 11/19/2018.
No. 17-1625 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States ____________________ RIMINI STREET, INC. AND SETH RAVIN, Petitioners, v. ORACLE USA, INC., ORACLE AMERICA INC., AND ORACLE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, Respondents. ____________________ On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ____________________ BRIEF FOR THE AMERICAN INTELLECTUA
Re: Comments Submitted Pursuant to “Notification of Inquiry,” 83 Fed. Reg. 52336 (Oct. 17, 2018)
January 15, 2019 Submitted electronically at www.regulations.gov Karen A. Temple Acting Register of Copyrights United States Copyright Office Library of Congress 101 Independence Ave, SE Washington, DC 20559 Re: Comments Submitted Pursuant to Notification of Inquiry, 83 Fed. Reg. 52336 (Oct. 17, 2018) Dear Acting Register Temple: The American Intellectual Property