Navigate Up
Sign In

Tuesday, June 9, 2015, Webinar

Claim Construction Caselaw Update:  Mechanical & Chemical Arts
12:30 - 2:00 pm Eastern

Course Description:
This webinar, which will cover the topic of claim construction, will be presented by two very experienced patent prosecutors, including a former USPTO examiner.  Various aspects of claim construction and the most up-to-date court decisions will be included in the presentation, including: the importance of providing multiple embodiments; preserving the single embodiment; over-limiting preambles; means-plus-function construction; claim differentiation; manufacturing practices affecting claim language; and many more.  Cases to be discussed include: Eidos Display, LLC v. AU Optronics Corp.; Pacing Technologies v. Garmin International, Inc.; MobileMedia Ideas LLC v. Apple Inc.; GE Lighting Solutions, LLC, v. Agilight, Inc.; Teva Pharmaceuticals USA v. Sandoz, Inc.; Enzo Biochem Inc. v. Applera Corp.; and many more.  This course will keep patent practitioners current on this constantly evolving legal area to allow them to serve their clients as best as possible.

Presented by:
Elizabeth K. Gemmell
Patent Attorney
Berenato & White, LLC
​Barry J. Herman
Partner, Patent Attorney
Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, LLP

Frederick W. Gibb, III - Principal and Founding Member, Gibb & Riley



Registration Fees Per Site:    
AIPLA Member
AIPLA Non-Member Rate
Single Site​ ​$145 ​$175
​2-10 Attendees per Site
All attendees must participate at the same location.
​$295 $325​
​11-20 Attendees per Site
All attendees must participate at the same location.
​$445 ​$475
​Over 20 Attendees per Site
All attendees must participate at the same location.
​$595 ​$625
ATTENTION attorneys in Louisiana, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Utah
These states mandate attorneys can only view a webinar at their own computer to receive CLE credit.  Single site registration required.
ATTENTION attorneys in Arizona
Arizona does not certify courses or providers. Arizona lawyers are required to independently review our regulations and make their own determination that it qualifies for credit towards their MCLE requirements. MCLE Regulation 104(A) identifies the standards to apply.  AIPLA will email an attendance affidavit to registrants requesting AZ CLE credit after the webinar.
ATTENTION attorneys in New Hampshire
New Hampshire attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance according to Supreme Court Rule 53.  The New Hampshire Minimum Continuing Legal Education (NHMCLE) Board does not approve or accredit CLE activities for the NH Minimum CLE requirement.  AIPLA will email an attendance affidavit to registrants requesting NH CLE credit after the webinar.
AIPLA’s webinars are available and accessible to individuals who are hearing impaired. If anyone at your location would like to know more about accommodations, please contact KRM Customer Service at We ask that you let us know at least 7 business days out from the webinar, to ensure that we can identify and deploy the solution that best fits our registrants needs.

Cancellation Policy: To get full refund, registrant must request refund 5 days prior to live event. If less than 5 days, registrant is transferred to product.​​




AIPLA has sought CLE accreditation* in the following states for credit(s): 
          *CLE accreditations updated upon receipt. 
​Alabama 1.5
Nebraska 1.5
​Alaska 1.5 Nevada

New Jersey 1.8
​California 1.5
New Mexico 1.5
Colorado 2.0
New York 
Delaware 1.5
North Carolina
North Dakota 1.5
Georgia 1.5
​​Ohio 1.5
Illinois 1.5
Pennsylvania 1.5
Iowa 2.0
Rhode Island

Kansas 1.5
South Carolina
Kentucky 1.5
Louisiana 1.5
Texas 1.5
Maine 1.5
Utah (self-study)
Minnesota 1.5
Vermont 1.5
Mississippi 1.5
Virginia 1.5
Missouri 1.8

Wyoming 1.5

Disclaimer:  AIPLA is a nonprofit national bar association.  The sole purpose of this CLE program is to provide educational and informational content.  AIPLA does not provide legal services or advice.  The opinions, views and other statements expressed by contributors to this CLE program are solely those of the contributors.  These opinions, views and statements of the contributors do not necessarily represent those of AIPLA and should not be construed as such.