Exhibitor & Sponsorship Opportunities
In This Section
Highlight your brand at the premier intellectual property law events in the industry. Find out more about being an event sponsor.
AIPLA offers a variety of advertising and sponsorship opportunities to showcase your organization's products and
Consider advertising or becoming a sponsor for any (or all) of our three annual stated meetings (Mid-Winter Institute, Spring Meeting and Annual Meeting), or take advantage of other opportunities to reach our constituents through advertising in AIPLA's Quarterly Journal, eBulletin, Notes + News e-newsletter, and/or on our website.
Reach AIPLA’s members with these options:
Market your organization's products and services during any, or all, of our three yearly meetings: The Mid-Winter Institute, Spring Meeting, and Annual Meeting. Options include advertising in the Convention Daily newspaper (distributed to all meeting attendees onsite), AIPLA's printed Program Preview (mailed to prospective attendees), or Final Program (distributed to all meeting attendees onsite). You may also increase your organization's visibility through any of our diverse sponsorship opportunities. AIPLA offers sponsorship levels compatible
For rates, availability, or additional details, please contact:
Click here for sponsorship and exhibitor opportunities at our 2022 Mid-Winter Institute Event.
For additional information please contact: aipla@aipla.org
Upcoming Events
Contact
Credits
90 Minutes of CLE
Registration
This webinar will focus on the best practices for surveys in trademark infringement and false advertising litigation. We will review the court-approved methodologies for the various types of surveys often used in trademark infringement and false advertising litigation. We will then present the recent case law discussing survey evidence, the pitfalls that often lead to a survey being excluded or accorded little weight, and the best practices for increasing the likelihood that surveys will be admitted and used persuasively to help prove your case. This webinar is a must not just for trademark litigators but also in-house counsel who want to make sure that the expense of a survey is well justified.
Speakers:
Wendi Sloane, Barack Ferrazzano Kirschbaum & Nagelberg, LLP
J. Michael Keys, Dorsey & Whitney, LLP
Lauren Keller Katzenellenbogen, Knobbe Martens
This event is free to AIPLA members who are not requesting CLE. Standard webinar pricing applies to those requesting CLE. CLE is automatically included for our All Access Pass holders and Corporate Subscribers.
Pricing below only applies to those requesting CLE
Special rate for AIPLA SOLO PRACTICE/SMALL FIRM MEMBERS: $65
Special rate for AIPLA STUDENT MEMBERS: $10
In response to Covid-19, AIPLA has put in-place a new process for Multiple Attendee Site registrations that allows each site registrant to participate in the webinar independently.
Registration includes:
- For multiple-attendee sites, each registered participant will receive individual logins due to Covid-19 social distancing requirements.
- CLE certification/processing for applicable states. Reference CLE Information below for complete details.
- Webinar materials, including complete CLE processing information, accessible 24-48 hours before webinar date.
Cancellation Policy:
To get full refund, registrant must request refund five (5) days prior to live event. If less than five (5) days, registrant is transferred to product.
System requirements:
Webinar access is compatible with any Windows 7 or later computer, Android OS devices, or Apple/iOS devices. Check system compatibility here.
Accessibility for hearing impaired:
AIPLA’s webinars are available and accessible to individuals who are hearing impaired. If anyone at your location would like to know more about accommodations, please contact cle@aipla.org. We ask that you let us know at least 7 business days out from the webinar, to ensure that we can identify and deploy the solution that best fits our registrants needs.
CLE INFORMATION
AIPLA is a pre-approved CLE provider with the following states:
- Alaska
- California
- New Hampshire
- New Mexico
- New York
- Pennsylvania
- Vermont
AIPLA has applied for CLE accreditation in the following states:
- Florida
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Minnesota
- Ohio
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Virginia (may not receive Ethics credits)
- Washington
CLE Restrictions:
ATTENTION attorneys in Louisiana, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Utah
These states mandate attorneys can only view a webinar independently at their own computer to receive CLE credit. Multiple attendees prohibited.
ATTENTION attorneys in Alabama
AIPLA does not submit courses for approval in Alabama. Alabama attendees may select the free, no CLE option to watch the webinar and use course materials and their certificate of attendance to request course approval directly from the Alabama State Bar.
ATTENTION attorneys in Arizona
Arizona does not certify courses or providers. Arizona lawyers are required to independently review AZ's regulations and make their own determination that it qualifies for credit towards their MCLE requirements. MCLE Regulation 104(A) identifies the standards to apply. AIPLA will email an attendance affidavit to registrants requesting AZ CLE credit after the webinar.
ATTENTION attorneys in New Hampshire
New Hampshire attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance according to NH Supreme Court Rule 53. The New Hampshire Minimum Continuing Legal Education (NHMCLE) Board does not approve or accredit CLE activities for the NH Minimum CLE requirement. AIPLA will email an attendance affidavit to registrants requesting NH CLE credit after the webinar.
Disclaimer: AIPLA is a nonprofit national bar association. The sole purpose of this CLE program is to provide educational and informational content. AIPLA does not provide legal services or advice. The opinions, views and other statements expressed by contributors to this CLE program are solely those of the contributors. These opinions, views and statements of the contributors do not necessarily represent those of AIPLA and should not be construed as such.
Add to: