Continuing Legal Education (CLE)

AIPLA CLE Webinar: RAPID RESPONSE: On-Sale Bar After Helsinn

February 7, 2019 3:00 PM to 4:00 PM (Eastern Standard Time)


1.0 CLE Credits


Fee: $95.00 and Up

Register Now

Join our esteemed panel to learn what you need to know about the Supreme Court’s Helsinn opinion, and how it affects your practice. In particular, the panelists will address questions that remain after the Supreme Court’s opinion, and will provide guidance for patent practitioners looking to keep their practice sharp. Brad Pedersen and Brian Stanton are co-authors of the treatise Patents After the AIA (America Invents Act): Evolving Law and Practice, and are intimately familiar with the on-sale bar patentability limitation.
Presented by: Brian Stanton, Ph. D. of Stanton Consulting Services and Brad Pedersen of Patterson Thuente Pedersen, P.A.


AIPLA Member

General/Non-Member Rate

Single Site (1)



2-10 Attendees per Site
All attendees must participate at the same location.



11-20 Attendees per Site
All attendees must participate at the same location.



21+ Attendees per Site
All attendees must participate at the same location.




Registration includes:

  • For multiple-attendee sites, all participants must attend at the same location.
  • CLE certification/processing for applicable states.  Reference CLE Information below for complete details.  
  • Webinar materials, including complete CLE processing information, accessible 24-48 hours before webinar date.

Cancellation Policy:

To get full refund, registrant must request refund five (5) days prior to live event. If less than five (5) days, registrant is transferred to product.


AIPLA MEMBERS: Did you know AIPLA offers our Solo-Practitioner members a special registration rate of $65 for all CLE webinars?  Please contact AIPLA directly at to complete your registration or access the registration form here.

System requirements: 

Webinar access is compatible with any Windows 7 or later computer, Android OS devices, or Apple/iOS devices.  Check system compatibility here.

Accessibility for hearing impaired:

AIPLA’s webinars are available and accessible to individuals who are hearing impaired. If anyone at your location would like to know more about accommodations, please contact We ask that you let us know at least 7 business days out from the webinar, to ensure that we can identify and deploy the solution that best fits our registrants needs.


AIPLA has sought CLE accredidation* in the following states for credit(s): 

*CLE accredidations updated upon receipt.












Rhode Island



South Carolina










Utah (self-study)






New Jersey





New Mexico





New York

West Virginia



North Carolina



North Dakota













CLE Restrictions: 

ATTENTION attorneys in Louisiana, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Utah
These states mandate attorneys can only view a webinar independently at their own computer to receive CLE credit.  Multiple attendees prohibited.

ATTENTION attorneys in Arizona

Arizona does not certify courses or providers. Arizona lawyers are required to independently review AZ's regulations and make their own determination that it qualifies for credit towards their MCLE requirements. MCLE Regulation 104(A) identifies the standards to apply.  AIPLA will email an attendance affidavit to registrants requesting AZ CLE credit after the webinar.

ATTENTION attorneys in New Hampshire

New Hampshire attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance according to NH Supreme Court Rule 53.  The New Hampshire Minimum Continuing Legal Education (NHMCLE) Board does not approve or accredit CLE activities for the NH Minimum CLE requirement.  AIPLA will email an attendance affidavit to registrants requesting NH CLE credit after the webinar.   

 Disclaimer:  AIPLA is a nonprofit national bar association.  The sole purpose of this CLE program is to provide educational and informational content.  AIPLA does not provide legal services or advice.  The opinions, views and other statements expressed by contributors to this CLE program are solely those of the contributors.  These opinions, views and statements of the contributors do not necessarily represent those of AIPLA and should not be construed as such.

Add to:




  • Dog Invalidity Finding Affirmed for Dog Gene Patent

    August 16, 2019

    The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on August 9, 2019, held that the University of Bern, a Swiss university, could not claim sovereign immunity to stop a challenge to its patent related to the detection of a mutation in dog DNA.
  • Lawnmower Lawnmower Steering Patent Invalidation Reversed by Federal Circuit

    August 15, 2019

    The Federal Circuit on August 12, 2019, reversed the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s (PTAB) invalidation of patent claims covering a lawnmower steering mechanism, holding that the Board’s decision was “predicated on its incorrect claim construction” of the term “mechanical control assembly.”
  • Networking Federal Circuit Rules for AT&T in Networking Patent Dispute

    August 13, 2019

    The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on August 12, 2019, affirmed a lower court’s ruling that AT&T Mobility LLC and Ericsson Inc. didn’t infringe Iridescent Networks Inc.’s networking patent.
  • Hylete Thumbnail Hylete Bid to Register ‘H’ Trademark for Athletic Apparel Fails

    August 7, 2019

    The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on August 1, 2019, held that Hylete, an athletic performance apparel company, could not undo the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board’s decision to reject its trademark application.
  • PTAB Precedential Decision PTAB Designates Two Decisions as Precedential

    August 6, 2019

    The US Patent and Trademark Office on August 2, 2019, designated two Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) decisions as precedential and another as informative.