Continuing Legal Education (CLE)

Lessons from Recent CAFC Decisions and PTAB Challenges

October 9, 2018 12:30 PM to 2:00 PM (Eastern Daylight Time)

Credits

1.5 CLE Credits

Registration

Fee: $95.00 and Up

Register Now

This webinar contains very relevant information for patent prosecutors, patent litigators, and those evaluating pending and issued patents by revealing new lessons learned from recent CAFC Decisions and PTAB Challenges. Specifically, this webinar goes deeply into the recent decisions: Gen. Hosp. Corp. v. Sienna Biopharmaceuticals; BASF Corp. v. Johnson Matthey Inc.; Multilayer Stretch Cling Film Holdings, Inc. v. Berry Plastics Corp.; Amgen v Sanofi; as well as many points of PTAB guidance. This program is a must attend for those wanting to stay on top of the emerging trends in this area.
 
Presented by: Pratibha Khanduri of Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.; Hojung Cho of McNeill Baur PLLC.

 

AIPLA Member
Rate

General/Non-Member Rate

Single Site (1)

$95

$195

2-10 Attendees per Site
All attendees must participate at the same location.

$295

$350

11-20 Attendees per Site
All attendees must participate at the same location.

$445

$495

21+ Attendees per Site
All attendees must participate at the same location.

$595

$650

 

Registration includes:

  • For multiple-attendee sites, all participants must attend at the same location.
  • CLE certification/processing for applicable states.  Reference CLE Information below for complete details.  
  • Webinar materials, including complete CLE processing information, accessible 24-48 hours before webinar date.

Cancellation Policy:

To get full refund, registrant must request refund five (5) days prior to live event. If less than five (5) days, registrant is transferred to product.

ATTENTION SOLO-PRACTITIONERS:

AIPLA MEMBERS: Did you know AIPLA offers our Solo-Practitioner members a special registration rate of $65 for all CLE webinars?  Please contact AIPLA directly at cle@aipla.org to complete your registration or access the registration form here.

System requirements: 

Webinar access is compatible with any Windows 7 or later computer, Android OS devices, or Apple/iOS devices.  Check system compatibility here.

Accessibility for hearing impaired:

AIPLA’s webinars are available and accessible to individuals who are hearing impaired. If anyone at your location would like to know more about accommodations, please contact cle@aipla.org. We ask that you let us know at least 7 business days out from the webinar, to ensure that we can identify and deploy the solution that best fits our registrants needs.


CLE INFORMATION 

AIPLA has sought CLE accredidation* in the following states for credit(s): 

*CLE accredidations updated upon receipt.

Alabama

1.5

Louisiana

Oregon

1.5

Alaska

1.5

Maine

Pennsylvania

Arkansas

1.5

Minnesota

1.5

Rhode Island

California

1.5 Mississippi

South Carolina

Colorado

Missouri

1.5

Tennessee

 

Delaware

1.5

Montana

Texas

Florida

Nebraska

1.5

Utah (self-study)

 

Georgia

Nevada

Vermont

1.5

Hawaii

New Jersey

 

Virginia

Idaho

 

New Mexico

1.5

Washington

Illinois

1.5

New York

1.5

West Virginia

 

Indiana

North Carolina

1.5

Wisconsin

Iowa

North Dakota

 

Wyoming

1.5

Kansas

Ohio

 

 

 

Kentucky

Oklahoma

 

 

  

CLE Restrictions: 

ATTENTION attorneys in Louisiana, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Utah
These states mandate attorneys can only view a webinar independently at their own computer to receive CLE credit.  Multiple attendees prohibited.

ATTENTION attorneys in Arizona

Arizona does not certify courses or providers. Arizona lawyers are required to independently review AZ's regulations and make their own determination that it qualifies for credit towards their MCLE requirements. MCLE Regulation 104(A) identifies the standards to apply.  AIPLA will email an attendance affidavit to registrants requesting AZ CLE credit after the webinar.

ATTENTION attorneys in New Hampshire

New Hampshire attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance according to NH Supreme Court Rule 53.  The New Hampshire Minimum Continuing Legal Education (NHMCLE) Board does not approve or accredit CLE activities for the NH Minimum CLE requirement.  AIPLA will email an attendance affidavit to registrants requesting NH CLE credit after the webinar.   


 Disclaimer:  AIPLA is a nonprofit national bar association.  The sole purpose of this CLE program is to provide educational and informational content.  AIPLA does not provide legal services or advice.  The opinions, views and other statements expressed by contributors to this CLE program are solely those of the contributors.  These opinions, views and statements of the contributors do not necessarily represent those of AIPLA and should not be construed as such.

 

Add to:

 

 

News

  • Dog Invalidity Finding Affirmed for Dog Gene Patent

    August 16, 2019

    The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on August 9, 2019, held that the University of Bern, a Swiss university, could not claim sovereign immunity to stop a challenge to its patent related to the detection of a mutation in dog DNA.
  • Lawnmower Lawnmower Steering Patent Invalidation Reversed by Federal Circuit

    August 15, 2019

    The Federal Circuit on August 12, 2019, reversed the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s (PTAB) invalidation of patent claims covering a lawnmower steering mechanism, holding that the Board’s decision was “predicated on its incorrect claim construction” of the term “mechanical control assembly.”
  • Networking Federal Circuit Rules for AT&T in Networking Patent Dispute

    August 13, 2019

    The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on August 12, 2019, affirmed a lower court’s ruling that AT&T Mobility LLC and Ericsson Inc. didn’t infringe Iridescent Networks Inc.’s networking patent.
  • Hylete Thumbnail Hylete Bid to Register ‘H’ Trademark for Athletic Apparel Fails

    August 7, 2019

    The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on August 1, 2019, held that Hylete, an athletic performance apparel company, could not undo the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board’s decision to reject its trademark application.
  • PTAB Precedential Decision PTAB Designates Two Decisions as Precedential

    August 6, 2019

    The US Patent and Trademark Office on August 2, 2019, designated two Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) decisions as precedential and another as informative.