Navigate Up
Sign In

Wednesday, November 8, 2017 Webinar

12:30 - 2:00 pm Eastern

 

Parallel Universes: The Intersection of IPRs and District Court Litigations​

 
 
 Course Description:
 

 

The last several years have seen tremendous growth in Inter Partes Review (IPR) proceedings filed.   Many courts with parallel related litigation now routinely grant stays if and when the USPTO decides to accept the IPR petition and open the proceeding.  But have the IPR proceedings really simplified the overall process and cost of litigation?  What complexities have been created when not all issues are not resolved by the PTO proceeding?  Practitioners and judges are confronting more issues all the time.  Should the litigation be stayed?  What is the extent of any estoppel?  What is the potential impact to IPRs of the pending SAS Institute and Oil States Supreme Court cases?  How should the IPR proceedings shape any subsequent trial in the District Court, and are there any limitations on the evidence that should be admitted?  Join us and hear what our panel of experienced litigators and judges have to say about the intersection of IPRs and parallel district court litigations. 

 
Presented by: Don Banowit of Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.; R. Eric Hutz of Reed Smith, LLP; Chief Judge Joy Flowers Conti of United States District Court Western District of Pennsylvania; Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo of United State District Court Southern District of California. (moderated by) Patrick M. Arenz of Robins Kaplan LLP.

 
 

  
 

REGISTRATION INFORMATION

 
Registration Fees Per Site:    
AIPLA Member 
Rate
General/Non-Member Rate
Single Site (1) $95 $195
2-10 Attendees per Site
All attendees must participate at the same location.
$295 $350
11-20 Attendees per Site
All attendees must participate at the same location.
$445 $495
21+ Attendees per Site
All attendees must participate at the same location.
$595 $650
 
Registration includes:
  • For multiple-attendee sites, all participants must attend at the same location.
  • CLE certification/processing for applicable states.  Reference CLE Information below for complete details.  
  • Webinar materials, including complete CLE processing information, accessible 24-48 hours before webinar date.

Cancellation Policy: 
To get full refund, registrant must request refund 
five (5) days prior to live event. If less than five (5) days, registrant is transferred to product.
ATTENTION SOLO-PRACTITIONER
AIPLA MEMBERS: Did you know AIPLA offers our Solo-Practitioner members a special registration rate of $65 for all CLE webinars?  Please contact AIPLA directly at cle@aipla.org to complete your registration or access the registration form here. 

System requirements: 
Webinar access is compatible with any Windows 7 or later computer, Android OS devices, or Apple/iOS devices.  Check system compatibility here.
Accessibility for hearing impaired:
AIPLA’s webinars are available and accessible to individuals who are hearing impaired. If anyone at your location would like to know more about accommodations, please contact cle@aipla.org. We ask that you let us know at least 7 business days out from the webinar, to ensure that we can identify and deploy the solution that best fits our registrants needs.

 

CLE INFORMATION 

AIPLA has sought CLE accreditation* in the following states for credit(s): 
*CLE accreditations updated upon receipt.

​Alabama
Louisiana​ 1.50
Oregon​
​Alaska ​Maine ​Pennsylvania 1.50
​Arkansas ​Minnesota ​Rhode Island
​California 1.50
​Mississippi ​South Carolina
1.50
​Colorado
​Missouri
​Tennessee
​Delaware
​Montana
​Texas 1.50
​Florida ​Nebraska
​Utah (self-study)
​Georgia 1.50
​Nevada ​Vermont 1.50
​Hawaii 1.50 ​New Jersey
​Virginia
​Idaho ​New Mexico
​1.50 ​Washington
​Illinois
​New York
1.50
​West Virginia
​Indiana ​North Carolina
​Wisconsin
​Iowa
​North Dakota
​Wyoming 1.50
​Kansas ​Ohio
​Kentucky
​Oklahoma
 
 
CLE Restrictions: 
ATTENTION attorneys in LouisianaOhioPennsylvania and Utah
These states mandate attorneys can only view a webinar independently at their own computer to receive CLE credit.  Multiple attendees prohibited.
ATTENTION attorneys in Arizona
Arizona does not certify courses or providers. Arizona lawyers are required to independently review AZ's regulations and make their own determination that it qualifies for credit towards their MCLE requirements. MCLE Regulation 104(A) identifies the standards to apply.  AIPLA will email an attendance affidavit to registrants requesting AZ CLE credit after the webinar.
ATTENTION attorneys in New Hampshire
New Hampshire attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance according to NH Supreme Court Rule 53.  The New Hampshire Minimum Continuing Legal Education (NHMCLE) Board does not approve or accredit CLE activities for the NH Minimum CLE requirement.  AIPLA will email an attendance affidavit to registrants requesting NH CLE credit after the webinar.   

  

Disclaimer:  AIPLA is a nonprofit national bar association.  The sole purpose of this CLE program is to provide educational and informational content.  AIPLA does not provide legal services or advice.  The opinions, views and other statements expressed by contributors to this CLE program are solely those of the contributors.  These opinions, views and statements of the contributors do not necessarily represent those of AIPLA and should not be construed as such.

​​​​​​​​