AIPLA International Patent Law Handbook Contact Us Site Map
Countries/Regions
The American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA)
About the Handbook Contributors/Verifiers FastCross-Country FAQ's FastFind FAQ's
Home > Countries/Regions > AUSTRALIA

AUSTRALIA

Biotechnology and Chemical Inventions
Software and Business Method Inventions

Software and Business Method Inventions

AUSTRALIA

Patentable Subject Matter

Software

Are computer software-related inventions considered patentable subject matter?

Yes.

Requirements for patentability

A mode or manner of achieving an end result that is an artificially created state of affairs of utility in the field of economic endeavor.

Patent Office position on patentability

The Patent Office will look to see whether the software has resulted in a component being physically affected or the state of information in some part of a machine altered.  These changes do not need to be physically observable such that the changes produce a tangible product.  Thus instructions executed by a computer so as to achieve a desired result can be patentable.

Process claim

Yes. A patent covering an article may also provide protection for a process of producing or utilizing that article. Frequently, however, a patent is sought expressly for a specified process. (Volume 2, Australian Patent Office Manual of Practice and Procedure (Manual)).

Apparatus claim

Yes.

e.g. An apparatus for X, the apparatus including a, b and c.

Product or medium claim

Yes.

e.g. "A computer readable memory having recorded thereon statements and instructions for execution by a computer to X."

Signal Claim Yes.

e.g. A computer data signal embodied in a carrier wave and representing a sequence of instructions which, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to X.
Data structure claim

Yes.

e.g. “A computer readable memory containing data with a structure capable of causing a computer to operate in a particular manner, the structure comprising a, b and c."

Program claim

Yes. Two decisions of the Federal Court of Australia have established that computer program claims per se are patentable.

e.g. “A computer program element comprising a computer program code means to make the computer execute a, b and c.”


Back to top

Business Methods

Are business method inventions considered patentable subject matter?

Yes. Business method inventions are subject to the same legal requirements for patentability as are those that are applied to any other process or product.

Patent Office position on patentability

Business methods are protectable in practice but methods of doing business will be objected to if they relate to mere concepts or ideas, schemes, plans or working directions. (see Grant v Commissioner of Patents [2006] FCAFC 120)

The technical environment in which the business method is implemented should be included in the claims.

Examples of issued business method patents.

The Amazon "one-click" case has been accepted in Australia.


Back to top

Disclosure Requirements

Specification drafting strategy

Claims must be consistent with the terminology used throughout the specification. The specification must include a real and reasonably clear disclosure of the matter claimed. Generally, the body of the specification should include one or more statements of invention consistent with each independent claim.

Claim drafting strategy

Claims should be drafted in all allowable formats (where possible) covering functions/steps carried out by individual network entities (client/server) as well as the total network. (See specific examples of allowable claims above.)

Computer code deposit requirement

No.


Back to top

Miscellaneous

Patent Office policy initiatives regarding software and business method inventions.

None.


Contributor:
Paul Fong
p.fong@watermark.com.au
Verifier:
Mark Horsburgh
mhorsburgh@fak.com.au
Back to top
Disclaimer